The fun of being a gang stalking fashion leader


In other articles I have discussed the gang stalking tactic of mimicking the Target’s  appearance.  You wear red, they wear red. You go out in a brown coat, they go out in a brown coat. It seems the tactic is used to manipulate, to frame other people’s perceptions of you. You do not know or have any dealings with criminals (apart from the unwanted ones with gang stalkers). So the stalkers have to work to create criminal-type associations with you. People accept that people who dress alike may well be connected. The stalkers create a group of look-alikes, who also imply criminality. Those people are perceived criminals. They dress like you. Therefore you are part of their group, therefore a criminal.  Quod erat demonstrandum.

If you are a female Target, like myself, the stalkers will have spread the lie that you are a prostitute. This is hard to credit in my case, given my normal appearance is elderly, rural, dressing-down. They tried featuring some prostitute-looking women in adjacent streets, but they just looked very odd for this area. So they had to go back to the drawing board, how could they make my perfectly normal respectable look, look suspicious and they came up with gypsy. No doubt helped by my Irish accent. (No racism there, then, on two counts!). Wrong kind of Irish accent too, but most English would not know that.

I had to think about that. I went for a crew cut, and wore t-shirts with a Union Jack on, with “targeted-individual”, written on. Suddenly I was no longer surrounded by stalkers. I could even go into a cáfe and have a cup of tea in peace. But everywhere I went, the men were either bald, or shorn to an inch of their life. I remember sitting in a pub and having a drink, when something prompted me to look around.  I was surrounded by baldies, as if I had walked into a secret bald-head convention.

I had done my crew cut myself with trimmers, but I haven’t quite mastered the knack of cutting my own hair. Remembering that some of the postmen  at work had shaved their heads completely, I figured if I shaved it all off, presumably it would grow back at the same length. Well, it was fun, but I had to admit the look wasn’t “really me” and nobody told me how cold your head would feel.

Now it is growing back, I am quite happy with the result, it’s looking better every day. Now the issue is, will I let it stay at crew cut length, or let it grow and be plaited into dreadlocks, and set a new fashion trend in Harrogate next year?



“Blake’s Seven” – Prophetic Sci-fi

Various creative works have predicted gang stalking, most notably Patrick Magoohan’s “The Prisoner” and Sandra Bullock’s “The Net”. One you might have missed is another BBC Science Fiction drama from the seventies “Blake’s Seven”, concentrating on media and mind control and a very corrupt world government.

Citizens, not serfs

Among creative works, apparently prophetic, you might have missed the BBC tv drama, “Blake’s Seven”, a political science fiction series which came out in 1978 (before computers and wholesale surveillance).

You will feel immediately at home with the opening scene, a surveillance camera, overlooking strangely tranquillised pedestrians (the imagined future has a medicated water supply), against a background of hypnotic Muzak.

I don’t wish to spoil the story for you, and accepting that it was a typically creaky BBC Sci-fi production, which does indeed look dated, it was remarkably accurate in some of its predictions.

The black-clad militarised police who shoot first and make excuses later look like clones of the USA riot police or SWAT teams.

The ubiquity of computers and computer records, although the sophistication of our present computers was missed. The series accurately predicted the ease with which computer records and other kinds of evidence could be…

View original post 97 more words

Creating Scapegoats – a Political Reason for Gang Stalking?

When governments fail, or are intentionally implementing policies which the majority of the population rejects, they often resort to two diversion tactics. Waging war and the creation of scapegoats.

Perfect example, Nazi Germany.

The practice of scapegoating pre-dates the nation state. It is a very old tactic applied consistently in tribal and peasant societies, and the formula is very simple. The leadership, anxious to deflect resentment and attention away from themselves create an internal bogeyman, low ranking members of the society who are demonised, made out to be depraved and dangerous to the group, and the group is encouraged to freely persecute them. Resentment which might otherwise become focused on the ruling group, the direct instruments of the group’s problems, but who are usually hard to get hold of, is displaced onto conveniently available vulnerable members of the group who cannot defend themselves.

The targets chosen are so consistent, you could almost call the selection traditional.

The majority are low ranking women. The terms “crazy old woman” and “crazy old witch”  were once commonplace, showing at once the people viewed as being acceptable and deserving targets. Note the word “crazy”. Calling someone crazy is a very convenient term of abuse which covers a lot of bases. It immediately invalidates the person; it generates fear and derision; it reduces the status of the person to sub-human; and the real gem is a perfectly sane person can be made to appear crazy by meddling with their environment and how they are treated (gaslighting) until their adaptation to their unique circumstances, makes them look odd, thus providing evidence for the accusation. The term”witch” is a nice one to throw in too, in case some people’s consciences might be upset at the victimisation of a helpless old woman = she is not really helpless, she is a witch.

The selection of women as scapegoats serves a number of social functions. Targeting low status, young women so that they are socially isolated and made social outcasts, socially disempowers them and sets them up for rape and conscription into prostitution. They become a group men can rape with impunity, so channelling male social aggression from the powerful in society, and mollifying them with sex. Revolution can wait.

In misogynist societies, and the majority are, very intelligent women are often targeted. Males feel threatened by women leaders. The establishment, whatever it is, does not want anyone wising-up other people to their game.  As a rule, men want to keep the collective status of women beneath themselves. Take out the leaders and you can keep them all down. Another useful application of the term “witch”.

Targeting old women, and to a lesser extent elderly men – the elderly targeted are usually alone, widows or widowers, serves several functions. The elderly are often wise to the power games played in society. Like everyone else, they were mugs when young, but with more than a half century of experience, they have “seen it all” and they have learnt from their own, and others mistakes.  They can warn the young they are being gulled, if only the young would listen. Perhaps those with most wisdom to impart and a gift for finding an audience, are at the forefront of those targeted.

Getting rid of the elderly on trumped up charges, usually the accusation they have lost their marbles , can be used as the basis of stripping them of their life’s savings.  Poor people, who after a lifetime’s work could have passed something onto their children to help them out of poverty, are robbed. Their children remain poor, and exploited through their lives too.

Another old stereotype is “the village idiot”.  Not usually someone extremely insane, as such will be avoided, but people a little different from the norm. Perhaps a “simpleton” or someone with a minor physical and/or mental impediment that marks them as different. Another traditionally “safe” category for deflected social resentment. The charm here for the demonisers is that the targets are unavoidably visible and are safe targets to attack as they are usually non-violent and may have qualities which makes it difficult for them to defend themselves.

Gay men are not a particularly vulnerable group. But the heterosexual male psyche fears them. So it is relatively easy to channel aggression towards them.

When one considers the people selected for scapegoating, some qualities are outstanding. Criminals are never scapegoated. If scapegoating was a logical process, only criminals would be scapegoated. It would make sense for the group to protect itself with collective persecution of criminals, to drive them from the group to protect the group from crime. But the objective of scapegoating is NOT to protect the group, although that is the propaganda used to set sections of society up for attack. The objective is to channel resentment away from the rulers onto SAFE targets for group fears and frustration. Attacking criminals is not safe. They will retaliate. Scapegoating does not work if the victim can retaliate and hurt their persecutors. Also, it is quite possible that the rulers are perfectly happy for criminals to run loose in communities providing they confine their attention to the lower classes. Keep dumping problems on the lower classes and they will never be in a position to rebel.

Scapegoating then, is a deliberate policy of the powerful in a society or group, to deflect social resentment from themselves – the cause of the resentment – onto helpless, marginal people who cannot defend themselves so as to “take the heat” off the rulers.

So where does gang stalking fit into this? I am suggesting that gang stalking is an old routine in a new guise.

Post 2WW a social revolution occurred. Previously oppressed groups, working class women, blacks, gays, disabled, were suddenly able to access education, living-wage jobs, and were freed from traditional prejudices. Their socio-economic status was raised to full citizen status.  Some were obtaining top degrees at top universities and competing with the children of the elite for prominent jobs.

The major group of beneficiaries of the social revolution were working class women (including ethnic). En masse they sought education, competed with the middle classes and men for middle class jobs, and walked away from forced child-bearing, dependency on men, bad marriages, below subsistence jobs, and being forced into prostitution to stay alive.

The status quo was threatened and the fight back was immediate. COINTELPRO, under the banner of protecting the state from enemies, infiltrated and sabotaged such harmless and beneficial movements as the civil rights movement, and women’s and gay lib. The methods used were an encyclopedia of dirty tactics,    with heavy reliance on extensive smear/slander campaigns, meddling with intimate relationships, interference with targets education and job opportunities, unwarranted surveillance, attempts at entrapment and framing, etc.

What is the difference between COINTELPRO and gang stalking?  None that I can see, but there is one big similarity.  The existence of COINTELPRO was denied until it was forced into the open. Then COINTELPRO was officially ended.  Now gang stalking which follows the same formula is officially denied, the mention of it is vetoed in the MSM, and victims who complain are accused of insanity.

And the victims of gang stalking are the same people who have always been selected for scapegoating/community harassment, from the very origins of human society. – Low status women, old women, poor people with aspirations, gay people, people with minor physical and/or mental disability.

Harmless people, slandered with every despicable crime and depravity which humans are capable of – terrorist, drug dealer, paedophile, prostitute, insane.

This is how our ruling classes through the ages have protected their interests. Fomenting hatred against vulnerable, harmless groups in society. Setting them up for attack and condoning their abuse.

Nice people, eh?




What women targets of gang stalking may experience

Firstly, the woman target will often be working class, ethnic, poor, single and interested in getting an education and career. Heterosexual or gay, makes no difference.

The lies told about her, told to her neighbours, employers, teachers (at tertiary level), colleagues, and prospective boyfriends, will include that she is a prostitute,  drug taker or dealer, lesbian, mentally unbalanced, and paedophile. Some of these lies may also be spread to her relatives.

Naturally this will result in social shunning; prospective relationship stopped in its tracks or broken; termination of educational career;  blocked in getting employment or promotion;  friends “dropping” her and family keeping its distance. On the other hand, every sex pervert in the neighbourhood will make a bee-line to her door, the address conveniently supplied by the stalkers. She may attract vigilantes.

Meanwhile male wife-batterers and rapists will be moved in next door.

If living in a multiple-occupancy house, gang stalkers will come and live in the house and make a habit of leaving the front door open.

The woman target will have her privacy violated, in that surveillance in her home will be used as pornographic material to be used as “evidence” of the lies told about her, and to incite perverts to seek her out.

Attempts will be made to have her raped.

This looks like a formula for human traffickers to coerce women vulnerable due to low social status,  into prostitution.

But the question remains unanswered.  WHO ARE THE GANG STALKERS?





Gang stalking – the conspiracy theory that dare not speak its name.

A Word in Your Ear

At least as far as the MSM is concerned. This item has been successfully excluded from the Orwellian dictionary, and every other dictionary.

Even where gang stalking or organised community harassment occurs and is reported in the media, using the term “gang stalking” is completely verboten.

Why? If gang stalking is a conspiracy theory, why does it not receive the same public airing as all the other conspiracy theories – UFO’s, chem trails, Illuminati, NWO, aliens, 9/11, and so on?

Since when has there NOT been ample coverage of every conspiracy theory imaginable?

Consider.  A short time ago the Mafia were said to be a conspiracy theory.

Fact.  Scientology, viewed as a mind-control money making cult in most of Europe, established a practice of “Fair  Game” very similar to gang stalking.

Fact.  Whistleblowers from Karen Silkwood on have been known to be subjected to orchestrated campaigns of vandalism,  slander and…

View original post 206 more words

When gang stalkers take over –


.    Criminals, criminal looking/acting types will move in.   There will be a lot of noise.

.    Neighbours will sell up and move. There will be a lot of building work as the newly changed ownership houses will be extended and renovated.  Bed sits will be upgraded into expensive flats.  Houses changed from bed-sit accommodation into expensive Guest Houses.

.      The original house will change ownership and be upgraded.

Poor people, ordinary working people and retired people will no longer live in the area, having been priced out.



.    The previously high quality, reasonably priced service will gradually deteriorate.

.     Long-term staff will leave. Jobs will be cut. New cheaper staff, often immigrants will be brought in as they can be made to work harder, longer, in worse conditions for lower wages.

.     Previously high standards for food will deteriorate. Customers will complain about the quality and preparation. Broken facilities will be left broken. The place will become dirty.

.     The highest tariff possible will be charged.

Local people who previously worked there will be forced to move away to look for work. Another good value hotel providing a good service to ordinary working and retired people, lost.


.    The business will become corrupted.  An honest, reliable good service can no longer be relied on.  Where the service deals with confidential records, confidentiality will be compromised.  Essential documentation will be “lost” or  information altered.  Communication will be delayed, hampered or break down completely. The customer can no longer depend on the service and complaints will be ignored and fobbed off.  Often the customer will be made out to be the problem.



.   If possible, the shop will be extended and upgraded.

.    Jobs will be cut, and opening hours increased. Long term local employees will often be laid off to be replaced by cheaper, more easily exploited migrants.

Workers will work longer hours, have more duties, will lose any “perks”.

.     Cheap ranges of goods will be abandoned completely or greatly reduced. The shop will stock more high profit items. There will be little good value for the customer.

The end result will be jobs for local workers will be lost and those that remain will find their work conditions greatly deteriorated.   The shop will price out many poor and lower income customers such as pensioners.


The infiltration of accommodation and businesses start when someone posing as or actually being a member of the police or security services, invites the cooperation of the landlord/business owner to cooperate with the surveillance and harassment of an ordinary member of the public whom he slanders with lies that that person is a dangerous criminal/terrorist/drug dealer/prostitute/paedophile.

The recruited person is then completely under the “authority’s” control and cannot tell anyone what is happening because it is “national security”.

Having observed the above consequences of gang stalking infiltration, and being the person lied about, I cannot see what the connection between the above consequences has got with “national security”.



Another surreal gang stalking moment

The trouble with being gang stalked is you stop believing in coincidence.

I had another surreal gang stalking moment when  I opened my emails. An advertisement had appeared from a company I don’t have a subscription with telling me if I bought a teapot from them they would give me a matching cup and saucer free.

As it happens, I had been THINKING of getting a teapot, and I also need another mug.

Co-incidence? Or mind-readers at work?

(I am on my own so I mainly keep my thoughts to myself – or try to).