The evil of gang stalkers is the evil of human nature

Or another way of putting it – all human evil of human nature rolled into one package and directed at the target.

One Target (stoporganstalking) made the comment that being gang stalked was like being married to an abusive husband when you didn’t marry one.

For me it is like living with a nagging, unreasonable child when you didn’t have one because you know what they are like. Other people forget childhood and what children are like. I didn’t. But never mind, via gang stalkers I get the experience anyway.

Abusive husbands are malign and deliberate in what they do. Children can’t help being obnoxious, it is their natural state until they grow out of it and are trained into socialised adults.

The other category of conveying mental damage to people in their vicinity are the other innocent category of the mentally ill or brain damaged. The normal people usually damaged are those closest to them, the carers, most often women.

And the gang stalkers acts are criminal, and criminals are the major category of causing damage.

Nice species! So some clever people got together and collated all the damaging experiences that different categories of people cause others – abusive men, children, unsocialised and mentally damaged and criminals, and wrapped it all up in one package to be directed at targets – the majority of whom are low-status women.

You know what this looks like?  It looks like someone has defined the female role as being the garbage bin for all society’s rubbish and if a woman should dare to avoid being married to an abusive man; decline to take on the huge social and total handicap of having children; have the good fortune to not be required to be a carer or take every precaution to avoid abusive, stalking, sexually exploitive and criminal men, these “someones” will see to it she gets the handicap anyway, courtesy of gang stalking.

In other words, gang stalkers have taken it on themselves to define every woman’s role into one or another slave category. That women are being prevented from defining themselves, particularly working class women, from being self-determining and controlling their own lives. Women’s role (as defined by men) kitchen, bed and children. Or the Nazi version, “Kinder, Kuche and Kirche”,  (children, kitchen and church) which coincidentally could be shortened to KKK.

As the prevailing theory of gang stalking is that it is government sponsored – it couldn’t happen otherwise – this suggests that regardless of government rhetoric on human rights and equal opportunity, the reality is an underlying fascism, and women are the prime targets. Lower class women are now the Jews of Nazi Germany, the “niggers of the world”.


On a slightly different tack I have complained in an earlier blog about WordPress capitalising my category “taxes” into “Taxes”.  They have also done the same with the words “fascism” and “social engineering”, neither of which I want capitalised. Capitalisation if not at the beginning of a sentence implies deference – as in “God” as opposed to “god”. WordPress may have deference to “Taxes” and “Fascism” and “Social engineering”. For the record I wish to make clear, I do not, and WordPress or someone has altered my script.




Gang stalkers are subversives – but who are they subverting?

Gang stalking behaviour destroys social trust and cooperation, which causes social breakdown. So, gang stalkers subvert society.

But what is peculiar is their actions radicalise non- radicals and generate ferocious class hatred, specifically against the ruling elite and the elite in general. When you are being jerked around on a daily and continuous basis by “people in authority” even the mildest person after a time looks forward to the day they all go down in flames.

So who do gang stalkers represent, really? They WANT the people to get rid of the ruling class and come to despise all law and authority?

Subversion and fomenting insurrection?

(And your taxes are being used to pay for this).


Baiting – gang stalkers use children, a cult practice

Gangstalkers use staged provocation to make you look bad. In most cases it is best to ignore the bizarre behaviour – don’t respond and move away, otherwise it will look as if you are the “trouble-maker”.

The following are examples from my own experience.


An infant, aged about 4, but a precocious type, advances on me in a supermarket aisle, as I stand in front of the meat section.  His father/guardian is with him and looks and has the mannerisms of a social worker or teacher. The aisle is the wrapped meat counter and the child is sitting on the display. Gets up moves a couple of steps and sits again. This is repeated continuously as he advances towards me. His father says nothing, but is watching me. It seems he is being trained to provoke adults. I don’t respond. When he reaches me he plainly expects me to move out of his way. I remain standing in place. He looks at his father for guidance who just nods at him to walk around me.

You can see any response I might have made could have been manipulated in a number of ways. It could have been used to escalate a situation. Once the situation started the other party could lie to his heart’s content about what happened  and he would have been believed as he was obviously middle class and I am working class. Or what if I complained to a member of staff who did not witness the incident and the father denied that any such thing had happened? This could have been turned into a gaslighting situation where I would look like a weirdo suggesting that such bizarre behaviour had happened while the perfectly respectable seeming father denied it.

It was also a beautifully framed double bind. What kind of person does not find it offensive for a child to keep putting his bottom on products that other customers are going to buy afterwards, in ignorance of the child’s behaviour? But the bottom line is (sorry, couldn’t resist it) a child with a parent is the parent’s responsibility, and after that the shop staff. The days are long gone when any adult could correct any child’s aberrant behaviour. And it has never been acceptable to correct a child whose parent is present. That is their responsibility.

A different occasion a different shop. As before an adult with a child, this time an older child. This time I am in the patisserie section where the cakes displayed are uncovered. The child pushes in front of me and with his father immediately beside him proceeds to push his finger into each cake, one after another. Again the father is silent. I say nothing and walk away.

Even though on both occasions I adopted a course of action likely to lead to least harm, even that response could be used against me. Gang stalkers spread rumours and lies. They could still lie to bystanders/members of staff that I was the wife of those men, and how disgusting that I did not stop the children’s bad behaviour making me seem to be responsible for behaviour that had nothing to do with me and was staged. A clever gaslighting situation where any response of mine could be used to make me look bad.

I am in the library and a mother pushing a pram and with two young children comes and stands immediately behind me. The children start shrieking and stampeding up and down immediately behind me. This happened on two occasions in different parts of the library, different woman, different children.   In both cases my situation in the library – I was working on a computer – there was no reason for the children to position there. The mother was not talking to anyone. She wasn’t using a computer and they weren ‘t near any books. Also the librarians desk was a few feet away and the librarian ignored them. This library has a superlative children’s section in a separate room.  It was the mother’s job to see her children behaved properly in a library setting, or failing that, the librarian. Any reaction on my part could either have been used to escalate a situation or make it seem there was some connection between myself and those people.

Again in the library working on a computer, a young woman with a girl about 7, sits at the computer beside me. The girl sits on the desk virtually in my lap. Not a lot I could do about it. Perhaps I should carry thumb tacks to spread on my desk or sticky fly tape.

Children, usually boys aged about 10, in school hours and in term time sit beside me at the computers in the library, even though there are many empty seats elsewhere. As I mentioned, this library has an excellent childrens room, also equipped with computers. What can you do to keep children away? As a result of this nonsense with children in the library I bought an ipad with a cheap contract and now work from home.

Gang stalker controllers make their recruits engage in bizarre and anti-social behaviour.  Truancy is harshly dealt with these days but not when gang stalkers take children out of school as actors in their charades. Not only are gang stalkers   happy to exploit children, and train children to be pests and anti-social but you can see in the situations I have described, that other innocent members of the public are subjected to filthy and annoying behaviour too. Brought to you by people in “authority”. It demonstrates clearly the total contempt our elite have for anyone in society, including middle class, who do not belong to their elite group. That they readily treat people and our children as pawns in their sick and perverted games.




What happened to Tanya?

I am retired now. I only discovered about “gang stalking” two years ago after a combination of what I believe to be mis-treatment of my late husband by medical staff as he died of terminal cancer and the bizarre behaviour of a relative. I enquired on Wikipedia reference desk and was told the bizarre behaviour was “gaslighting” another concept new to me. They also recommended that I check out “mobbing”. In the process I discovered “gang stalking” which explained the stalking by strangers I had been subjected to while at student at Ulster University in the seventies and a cluster of strange events which happened at the same time.

As I reviewed my life in the light of the new gang stalking explanation I found my experiences fell solidly into the gang stalking pattern. Slander, poisoning all my social interactions, causing me to be shunned and subjected to arbitrary mis-treatment such as gratuitous rudeness, bad service and being ripped off at every opportunity. Blacklisting – finding it very difficult to find work and being harassed out of work. At one temp agency a member of staff passed a throwaway comment about my qualifications being fraudulent (A levels, University degree and secretarial qualifications). An interviewer queried an area of unemployment on my CV, suggesting I might have been in prison. At several accommodations the good/normal neighbours moving out to be replaced by extreme noise pests and very odd people exhibiting bizarre behaviour and lifestyles. Tenants being flooded out of their flats by over flowing baths until they left. Frequent arson events including being forced to move from one place (away from an over-flowing bath expert who regularly flooded our kitchen) when a fire in that tenants flat forced us to move. The firemen were brilliant. I came home from work to find all our possessions, including electrical, under taurpaulins to protect from the flood of water directed upstairs. All we lost was a smoked ironing board cover. This was followed by an invitation from the landlord to make an insurance claim under his insurance for items we had lost. My husband and I declined, pointing out we hadn’t lost anything.

The new neighbours were people that no woman would want as neighbours. At times prostitutes who had a habit of leaving the communal doors open and continuously breaking the security gates. (This was London. People get burgled even taking every precaution. Never mind prostitutes or people posing as prostitutes plying their trade from your same address). Or they were wife-batterers or rapists. At one address the Turkish migrants who moved in below – and this was in Yorkshire and five years before the migration flood gates were opened, raped a young woman of limited intelligence that they had lured to their flat. Her brother came to the flat but they wouldn’t answer the door. He stood outside screaming and crying “Why did you do it?”

As I reviewed my life with the new gang stalking model I could see these events, and this is only a small sample, were not accidental but orchestrated. And I was not the only one affected. Neighbours were scared or harassed into leaving or selling their homes. Landlords lost their houses. From going from easy-going landlords, not charging the highest rents, to going after every penny, maxing the rents and utility bills then finally losing their houses which were then converted from reasonable, affordable accommodation into luxury flats.  My first serious boyfriend was swindled out of his life’s savings. It was during the Handsworth’s riots (Birmingham) in the eighties. We lived in the opposite side of the city, but my boyfriend had his own personal riot outside his restaurant for an entire afternoon while he called the police in vain. Hours later when the rioters had got bored and gone home the police arrived and demanded to see all his staff’s passports that they were legal migrants. He was a very calm man, difficult to rile, but I swear as he told me the story steam was coming out of his ears.

And so I come to Tanya (not her real name). Over the years along with work I would volunteer time at charity shops. When I lived in London I volunteered at a local shop with two young manageresses. The shop was tiny but very successful helped by the fact that there was virtually nowhere to buy clothes in the immediate area. But soon they were having problems. I do not know the nature of all the problems as I was only an employee but it seemed to me that they were having more problems than you would expect from a charity shop. I put it down to “Wild West” London, which is nowhere near as civilised as the rest of the country. More criminals and nutters per square yard. Another volunteer joined after me. She was an odd one but it was difficult to pin point. I would have to say “shifty”. I prefer not to work with people nor money so my work was mainly unpacking and sorting and cleaning if there was any spare time. This girl hated me being in the storeroom when she was there. Turned out she was stealing from them and was sacked. One manageress left but “Tanya” remained. Then I started to get glimpses of the problems she was having. Her wages as assistant manageress were low, not sufficient for living in London, so she was under financial pressure. Many charity shops are leisurely environments, but not this one. It was busy, busy, busy. She told me, clearly upset, that her family were becoming estranged from her. She couldn’t see any reason. She was dismayed when she finally found out that they believed she was earning loads of money as a manageress but was frittering it (so they wouldn’t help her financially) but they also believed she was leading an immoral lifestyle. As an Asian who had previously enjoyed warm and close relations with her family, she was very distressed by their distance, lack of support and belief that she was engaged in immorality. I now know that these are gang stalkers tactics -overloading people at work, especially by sending trouble makers and thieves their way; insinuating into family relationships spreading lies – that someone is wealthy when they are poor, and that women in particular are immoral, so as to isolate the woman from her family and family support. I know this now, but twenty years ago I did not know about gang stalking or that I was being stalked.

Then one day after I had stopped working for the shop, Tanya turned up on my doorstep. She wanted to talk, so we went to a cafe. There she told me she had been raped. She had been having fish and chips with a male acquaintance at her flat, then he had raped her. While at University I had had friends who worked for Women’s Aid, so this was something that did not faze me, and ordinarily I would have moved onto a friendship footing due to this. Unfortunately she followed this with the remark “I am not going to let this affect how I see men”.  The helpers at Women’s Aid often discussed how long it took some women to adopt self-protective behaviour. It seems to be a uniquely female characteristic for women to have a weak sense of survival on their own behalf. A woman’s body and a weak sense of survival is not a good combination. Such women are not only at risk but endanger any other woman close to them. They are predator magnets. So I made no effort to continue the friendship. If I had known about gang stalking I would have acted differently.

I do not know what happened to “Tanya”. I now know she was being gang stalked, quite likely because I was being gang stalked and started working at the shop. I know she was a young, innocent, beautiful young woman from a respectable middle class Asian background, who came from a close and warm loving family. She was a completely normal young woman whose greatest ambition was to have a career. From my experience of the shop the manageresses were getting problems which were way over the top for a small charity shop. Evidently there was deliberate meddling in her personal life in that her family were having lies spread to them about her financial situation and life style. Her background was sheltered and she had no suspicions about men. Gang stalkers set women up for rape. And rape is often a precursor for inducting women into prostitution – along with managed estrangement from their families, friends or anyone else who would support them.