Why do gang stalkers target the “upright men?”

If only criminals admitted their crimes. If only gang stalkers would put their hands up and say who they are and why they are doing it. But the victims of the gang stalking crimes are in the same position as all other crime victims. Left sorting out the damage with no idea who is attacking them  or why.

Without any help from the authorities, with the outright denial by the authorities that gang stalking exists (they have been forced to admit that black listing exists. Sometimes they admit that police corruption exists. They admit that stalking exists. That grooming exists. That slander exists. Sometimes they can even be forced to admit that paedophilia exists. They acknowledge while dragging their feet that whistleblower reprisals exist. They admit that Scientologists “Fair Game” whose methods are identical with gang stalking exists. But no, according to the government gang stalking absolutely does not exist even though these methods were historically used by the Stasi and the KKK. And then  they have the gall to accuse gang stalking targets of suffering a delusion. But if you repeat a lie long enough …

So victims of gang stalking, Targeted Individuals are left guessing who is doing what to whom and why.

The Targets of gang stalking are the best clue. No, it is not upper class males of the ruling power elite. Yes it is the same  people in society who are constantly dumped on by their “superiors”.

The majority of Targets are working class women and ethnic groups. The second largest groups are gays. And the smallest group, which stands out because at first glance there seems to be no reason why they are targetted are the unique group dubbed “the upright men”.

That working class women, people of colour and gays are targetted seems no surprise. This just looks like classism, sexism/misogyny and homophobia have just gone underground, officially denied and publicly condemned but now continuing in secret with the same old persecution and denial of full citizen status.  That feminists are targetted also makes sense on a simple women-hating basis.

But as people who know about gang stalking have often noted, gang stalking employs a great deal of resources. How it is being financed has been one question not satisfactorily answered. This is one of the features that imply state involvement.

The targetting of lower class women and gays resonates with a sexual message. These particular targets suggest a sexual motive, and as the criminal sexual industry is very lucrative, this suggests a credible motive for gang stalking. The methods of slandering the woman especially the slander that she is a prostitute, then separating her from her family, friends and social support, denying her work or harassing her out of work, setting her up for sexual attack strongly suggest sexual grooming behaviour and the methods  sexual traffickers use to trap their victims. Gang stalking could be, among other things, coercive recruitment into prostitution. When you consider the insatiable market for porn and prostitutes obviously the major problem for the criminal industry is recruiting women where virtually no woman has any wish to be enslaved, and viciously sexually exploited to make somebody else rich. Coerced recruitment characterises the industry.

The Targeted Individual A K Forwood, proposed the theory that surveillance in the Targets homes was likely being sold over the internet to the insatiable porn market. This would tie in with the sex trafficker theory.

This theory – that gang stalkers are sex traffickers – then makes the choice  of targets perfectly clear. Poor women. Gay men. Feminists because many feminists work for charities which provide shelter for abused and homeless women. They are protecting the vulnerable targets.

And the last, mysterious group turns out not to be so mysterious after all.

The upright men – who protect women and of their nature cannot be blackmailed, coerced or bribed.

Change of title, change of theme

Hey ho, another day, another hassle.

Just brought up my “Gang Stalking Mysteries” blog to discover my header had been altered from the poster “I am also a Russian Spy” to the default theme in abstract garish orange and reds.

I belong to that generation who are not computer savvy. It was months before I figured out how to customise the header, and I thought the result was rather cool and reflected the concept of the blog perfectly.

So I call up the customise tool and try to bring my “I am also a Russian Spy” header back. No go. The set up says my header has been changed, but then doesn’t do it.

So in order to get rid of the garish reds I decide to alter the theme, to something more suitable with fewer options for interference? meddling? sabotage?

I settle on a new theme which looks good, but then find the title is bizarrely presented – Gang stalking myster-    and on the next line  -ies.

Well, that will wow the audience.

After bumbling around trying to find how to prevent illogical word splitting I gave up and decided to shorten the title to “G??G Stalking”. So far WordPress or whatever, have not hyphenated it.

I can console myself  with the thought that “gang stalking” does not exist but so far government writers of our dictionaries  who tell you that words mean something completely different from what they actually do and other concepts that there are words for, don’t exist, have so far not attempted to tell the public that stalking does not exist. Although they are still trying to tell the public despite the evidence accepted by everyone else in the country that “blacklisting” does not exist.

The government still allows the public to acknowledge the existence of bullying in schools (although authorities have the habit of denying it is happening in any particular instance); bullying at work (ditto for bullying in schools with the added oftentimes that the victim is imagining it); harassment by neighbours (keep telling us about it and we’ll keep ignoring it until we get fed up and accuse YOU of being the problem); slander (only for rich people who can afford to sue); sex perverts next door (well they have to live somewhere, why not beside you); corrupt police (we’re working on it); framing (what corrupt police do); gagging (when you are victimised by the authorities you’re not allowed to talk about it, and neither are the press); censorship (same as gagging);  Identity Theft (major growing crime largely ignored by the media. It’s your problem to sort out); psychiatric hospital (not for the mentally ill. Reserved for people who disagree with the government’s version of reality); whistleblowers (don’t need them really); vigilantes (one rule for us, different rule for them); KKK (all gone now, never happened); Nazis (ancient history); Mafia (they live in Sicily, don’t they?); organised and white collar crime ( yeah, yeah but what the public really want to hear about is the spotty adolescent who threw a stone at somebody’s cat); political corruption (we have an excuse); brain washing (no, we absolutely don’t do it, No! No! No! – we’re just sending psych people into Job Centres to help the poor deluded fools who can’t find jobs – they are looking in the wrong place. Try India).

Hell’s bells, I could fill several pages of government twaddle as they assert this and deny that, and tell us they are working on the problem. It will be fixed some time next century, probably towards the end.

A friend once remarked that I was “abnormally” sane. It comes from following the advice a wise old man who really understood Ireland and Irish politics gave me. “If you start trying to understand how mad people think, by the time you understand you will be as mad as they are”.

Mad people can do your head in all at once in a crash course or by slow, gently sliding degrees – the slowly boiling frog. Either way, if you follow them, you end up nuts.

It bothers me when the government is sending psychiatrists to deal with the public in Job Centres at public expense having decided to only remember AUSTERITY when it suits them, when it looks like it is the government who need psychiatric help.

Transactional analysis from the insane – I’m OK, you’re all mad.

Or as an Irishwoman remarked proudly when watching her son marching out-of-step at a parade “They’re all out of step but my Johnnie”.

So, Gang Stalking Mysteries becomes G??G Stalking.

Who knows. Perhaps there are victims of stalking out there who didn’t realise they were being gang stalked.

Perhaps there are victims of blacklisting, slander, neighbour harassment, bureaucratic disservice, dishonest businesses, mobbing, vandals, anti-social pests, bullying, discrimination, prejudice, and general abuse everywhere they go, who do not realise they are being gang stalked. In fact being treated to all the worst features of racism, sexism and homophobia which are not supposed to exist anymore and against which the authorities pretend to take a strong stand. (But don’t mention classism – that doesn’t count).

Perhaps the gang stalkers who outnumber the gang stalking targets by ratios of hundreds to one will wake up from their cult-induced insanity and realise that they have been conned by people in authority/posing as people in authority, and they are all stalkers.

That our Pied Piper governments are all leading us a merry dance over a cliff.

 

image

 

 

 

There’s no such thing as “gang stalking” the authorities say. Perhaps we are using the wrong word. How about “framing”.

Have the authorities heard of “framing”? That practice of corrupt police sometimes working in collusion with criminals to shelter the criminals crimes.

Consider the methods used against the target. Someone either having or pretending to have official credentials freely criminally defames the target who is innocent of any crime. Coincidentally the police are allowed to slander people. The slanders spread are that the person is a drug user or dealer, prostitute, paedophile, jail bird, mentally unbalanced, terrorist – any combination or all to shock the dupe about to be recruited into cooperating with activities directed at the target.

Example. How do you think shop staff would behave if someone official “tipped them off” that a particular person is a shop lifter? Naturally they would follow that person about. They would scrutinise what they bought and what they put in their shopping basket. It might even be suggested to them that they get in that shopper’s way constantly to “put the wind up them” to let them know they are being watched. Honest shop workers will gladly do this viewing it as part of doing their job and grateful for the tip – except they’ve been lied to. They are the ones being played.

I have never shoplifted nor stolen anything in my life. My parents were honest to the point of being ridiculous. My mother’s father had been a policeman for a time. My mother taught me to always avoid ambiguous situations. Never permit grey areas. Never do anything that an onlooker putting an unfavourable interpretation on it could make out you were doing something wrong. When in shops keep your bags closed and don’t open them. Carry any item you intend to buy away from your body, obviously visible. Stay in the middle of the aisles away from the produce. Don’t wear concealing clothes.  Her training has proved priceless now I have discovered I am a target of gang stalking. I never do anything at any time which would contribute even to an appearance of guilt. So those seeking to frame me have to do all the running.

So the government, authorities, whatever deny the existence of gang stalking. I apologise. I should not have called it gang stalking. I should have called it by its correct name – framing.

Now what advice does the government/authorities have for working class women, people of colour, gays who are being framed, blacklisted, mobbed at work, stalked by perverts, slandered, persecuted by noisy, anti-social, criminal neighbours, denied service, wrongly billed, harassed, and lied to by officialdom?

Don’t be shy, after all, gang stalking does not exist.