IF gang stalkers are state spies (financed by the taxpayer) they are fomenting hatred against groups such as blacks, gays and feminists

According to the authorities gang stalking is a myth, but they don’t/can’t deny that all the elements that combined comprise gang stalking do not exist – stalking, bullying, harassment, black listing, slander, vandalism, gaslighting, noise harassment, smear campaigns, lies, cult activities, manipulation, intimidation, police corruption, political corruption, framing, etc.

Also the targets of gang stalking are the same old – working class, especially working class women, black, gay, feminist.

The difference is today our governments have a huge shop window filled with ostentatious displays of  social inclusion, special favours to “minorities” , draconian penalties for unpolitically correct thought and words, and the star of the show “gay marriage” while in the back room the same old persecution is going on as before – only denied. Point this out and you are labelled insane.

Why are our governments fomenting hatred?

They need scapegoats for their bad policies causing destruction to our societies?

They are providing “legitimate” outlets for frustration onto helpless groups”

They are using “harassment by proxy” to get rid of those opposed to, and most likely to be damaged by their policies?

They are following the well trodden fascist agenda of exploiting/eliminating the weakest in society?

They are getting rid of potential opponents before those opponents recognise the need to get rid of THEM?

They are racists and homophobes who wish to eliminate blacks and gays?

Their fascist agenda demands that the working class are pushed into the gutter and kept there?

They want all women confined to domestic, sexual and reproductive roles and denied full adult citizen and socio-economic status? And working clas women reduced to prostitutes?

Perhaps there is no mystery attached to gang stalking at all – called gang stalking or any other name, it is what you get when fascists are in charge.




Applying Murphy’s Law to the plebs – problem dumping

We all know the joke Murphy’s Law ” anything that can go wrong, will go wrong”.  The saying appears to have originated out of the craft of engineering,  where people learnt from experience that things had to be designed exactly right, or sooner or later they would fail.  But the expression soon spread into wider society where common experience suggested that such a “law” explained why things go wrong.

Of course, things don’t just go wrong, they are caused to go wrong. One of the enlightening experiences of parenting is the amazing chaos sub-intelligent beings (children) can cause without putting any effort into it, and the amazing amount of effort the parent has to invest in order to head off incipient disaster. If we weren’t blinded by biology into liking our children they would seem fine gifts to give our enemies to bring disaster, loss and 24/7 disruption into their lives.

So far the military have not used children as such as a means to sabotage their enemies.  However, where it comes to sabotage, attrition, dirty tricks, distraction, stressing, exhaustion, contamination, and designing risk situations, it seems as if the military complex has discovered that children’s erratic, unreasonable, wasteful and plain batty behaviour are excellent tactics to inflict on anyone you want to oppress.

There is a class dimension to this as well. Personally, I have no objection to people of wealth and status distancing themselves from the problems caused by living in close proximity to other people. I do object though when they use their wealth and political clout to enforce those bad conditions on people of lower rank and wealth who are trying hard to avoid them. It seems the upper classes are not just content to put themselves out of harms way, but deliberately put others into harms way, like a sort of social sponge to soak up everything harmful in society before it reaches them.  Their motive is not to solve problems or allow social problems to be solved, but to displace problems onto every group apart from their own, to maintain their pre-eminent position. Not problem solving but problem dumping. They don’t want the problems solved. They are using them as weapons to attack lower social class groups without seeming to do so.  It is harassment by proxy.

There is no need for the general populace to be afflicted with noise, anti-social neighbours, out of control dogs and children, vandals and intimidation from gangs of criminal youths. That was what the police were invented for in the 19th century, and until the end of the 20th century they were doing a relatively good job in maintaining the public peace. Even a poor person if they are law-abiding should have the right to live their life in reasonable peace and security – unless the state is saying that is no longer the state’s responsibility, and it is up to each citizen to do what is needed to ensure their own peace.

Problems don’t just happen. Everything that happens is caused. If  the reason for the manufacture of social chaos from which the ruling class are immune, is that the ruling class intend to hide behind their high walls and ghettoise the entire rest of the population, it is time to concentrate attention on the cause, and refuse to be distracted by the symptoms.


Stigmatising the entire population as criminals to legally steal their assets and justify totalitarian rule – is that the game?


Pretend, just for the sake of argument, that we are being ruled by criminals whose ambition is to commit the Grand Theft of stealing EVERYTHING that everyone owns, and reduce everyone to slavery.

In a democratic country, under rule of law, how could that be accomplished?

Our laws protect us. As citizens we have rights. Institutions such as banks, pension providers, taxation, employment and other official records and bureaucracies are run honestly, legally and with professional integrity by people of integrity who can be trusted.

Who is best placed to corrupt an entire society? Who knows how everything works and can pull strings in every area of society?

The first safeguard of a citizen is that he is law-abiding. In a rule of law society the only justification that the state has to interfere in a citizen’s life is criminal behaviour. Against criminals the state has the right to pry, set aside privacy, practice surveillance, accuse, arrest using direct force and confine to prison or a mental institution.

All the state has to do to justify direct force against a citizen is to class the citizen as a criminal. An entire country of law-abiding people can be made out to be criminal by creating such a plethora of nit-picking laws that a person who jay-walks or drops a cigarette butt is put into the same category as murderers, racketeers or embezzlers and treated with draconian penalties.

But there will still be many people who avoid even accidentally breaking any of society’s rules. To trap such the judiciary itself needs to be corrupted. Judges who pass perverse sentences. Defence lawyers who act for the prosecution. Corrupt police who fabricate and conceal evidence. Administrators who “lose” records. And if all else fails psychiatrists who are prepared to declare anybody insane and needing urgently to be confined to a mental institution.

But still there are large areas of social activity where records of fact are maintained as a matter of course. Records which prove a person’s identity, prove their education and health, reveal a lifetime of honest work and fulfilling all social obligations. To be able to discredit and criminalise anyone in society, all these social institutions, bureaucracies and records have to be infiltrated.

Corruption in high places is a staple of human history and every country in the world. Ruling elites are noted for their duplicity, venality and personal moral corruption. They have skeletons in the cupboard which can be used to guarantee their total compliance.

But the generally honest middle class, with their class ethic of high professional and personal standards have since their emergence subsequent to the Black Death, been a strong counter force to the corrupt ruling class.  Corrupting this mainstay of social justice, fairness, rationality and stability requires planning.

The middle class mind-set has three Achilles heels. The first is their own honesty, with the resultant difficulty in understanding criminality in others. The second is their desire to better themselves which leads to irrational deference to the social class above, which generally does NOT share their ethical values. The third is their fear of losing status to working class people with greater ability. The middle class is hypocritical in that they say they wish people to be judged and promoted on their merit, where it applies to middle class people such as themselves so that they can be promoted, but they do not wish working class people to be included in the competition.

So the middle classes naivety can be exploited, alongwith their hopeful and trusting deference to their “social superiors”. All that a “superior” has to do to gain a middle class persons cooperation is to tell them what they want to believe – that that working class/black person they dealt with in the course of their work as an employer/doctor/landlord/estate agent/bank employee etc, is a dangerous criminal and the state needs their help in surveillance of that person in the interests of national security. Once recruited their lives will be trawled for any criminal behaviour however minor to be used against them. And this comprehensive trawl will be extended to their family and nearest associates. Knowledge is power indeed.

Now the corrupt tools of a corrupt state has access to medical records, bank records, housing provision, employment provision, and legitimate confidential records of all kinds on everyone in the country which can be scrutinised for wealth to be appropriated whenever convenient at some time in the future when crucial records have been “lost” or altered.

The middle classes in harness to corrupt rulers, the working class harassed, stone walled and attacked at every turn, control is complete.



Double-Binds – all innocent acts can be made to look guilty

Is there a school somewhere which teaches how to make innocent acts “evidence” of guilt?

Criminalising the law-abiding takes some work, as the law-abiding don’t commit crimes, avoid crime venues, avoid criminals,  and engage in innocent, law-abiding activities.  However, with a bit of imagination, and tweaking the context, all innocent acts can be used to make a person look guilty.

The first part is the innocent act. The second part is how it can be twisted to imply guilt.

1. A man walking with his son = paedophile

2. Woman dressed as a normal woman = prostitute

3. Dowdy woman = lesbian

4. Friendly, social person = drug dealer

5. Unfriendly, asocial person  = mentally unbalanced loner

6. Working class person = criminal

7. Black, coloured, ethnic = criminal

8. Muslim, especially young male Muslim = terrorist

9. Irish = terrorist

10. Working class person = gypsy

11. Woman who likes children = paedophile

12. Woman who doesn’t like children = insane

13. Poor people = thieves, insane

14. Elderly = senile

15. Handicapped = mentally challenged even when handicap is physical

16. Ill and dying = welfare scroungers

17. Unemployed = work shy, welfare scroungers, criminal

18. Young people  = drug users or dealers

19. Gardener = pot grower

20. Lover of house plants – pot grower and smoker

21. Homeless = alcoholics, drug users, insane

22. Single mothers which include widows and women who have been deserted = promiscuous welfare scroungers

23. Retired person on a pension = the majority of “welfare” recipients, therefore undeserving

24.Dog owner = criminal, drug user

25. Person with gap on their CV due to unemployment  = criminal, jail bird

26. Person with qualifications = liar, fraud

27. Person without qualifications = lower class scum

28. Person who dresses smartly  = only doing that to fool people, con artist

29. Person who doesn’t dress smartly  = lower class scum, gypsy, drug user, criminal, insane

30. Person who drinks  = alcoholic

31. Christian = bigot, deluded

32. Jew = every problem in the world is caused by Jews

33. Black = lazy, drug dealer

34. English patriot  = Nazi racist

35. White person  = racist

36. Feminist  = lesbian, communist, man-hater, insane

37. Middle class person = racist

38. Woman virgin = lesbian, man-hater, frigid, mentally abnormal


This is going to be an on-going list as I think of more. Someone is playing the stereotype game, exploiting and reinforcing stereotypes to maximise political and social rifts, the old divide and rule classic. Stereotyping  stigmatises an entire group with the actions of a few and can be used as a weapon to justify attacking any member of a group with the implication  of criminality and or insanity, where the person is entirely innocent.

Up until recently Western societies had largely shrugged off old-fashioned bigotry, but it seems there are strong forces at work reviving old hatreds and inventing new ones.

We are all being conned and played against each other. We need to resist this toxic trend. It is my dream that the people at the heart of it will be exposed to public view along with their game plan. That is my prayer.


The Nanny Complex

One targeted Individual described the experience of being gang stalked as like being married to an abusive husband – except you never married one.

In my experience being gang stalked is like a return to childhood. On the one hand the stalkers invalidate you to the status of a non-person. You are excluded from all normal freely entered into social interactions with others. And standard institutions in place of outright refusing to deal with you are so obstructive and provide such a bad or hostile service, you soon decide to save yourself the bother. And then there is the other highlight of childhood. The unwanted intrusive company of irrational, inconsiderate, unpredictable people with the social graces of pigs. Gang stalkers behave like over-grown children.

Psychiatrists are forever inventing new psychological conditions. Well, I have a suggestion. Call it “the nanny complex”.  A dangerous pathological condition afflicting people in power, a sub-set of control-freakery. Victims of “the nanny complex” do not understand normal adult maturity. Their own minds have never matured beyond childhood so they think nobody elses  has either. As a consequence they are driven to treat everyone as children, prevent anyone from maturing beyond childhood,  take delight in all the obnoxious and mindless behaviours of children, and think everybody’s behaviour should be totally controlled. Ever watch a toddler trying to force a pet to do what it wants?

Clearly if such people get in power their pathology forced on a normal population will be tremendously destructive.

In the meantime, I, a working class female at the bottom of the social heap can enjoy the surreal entertainment of watching my middle-class “superiors” being played for fools and reverting to the childish behaviours of copying the clothing of the target of the day; engaging in silly conversations they do not understand; banging and clattering around like tots in a tantrum; slamming doors, stamping about and making as much noise as they can; deliberately vandalising and dirtying property; telling lies; not doing their job correctly, even though intelligent and highly trained; stealing; nosing into things they have no business in and moving other people’s private property about; contaminating food; leaving smells; littering; being cruel to pets; uprooting plants and cutting down trees; pretending to be people they are not; walking around in a mob; invading others personal space; talking loudly; deliberately getting their children to act in anti-social ways, encouraging them to scream loudly and often for no purpose; encourage their dogs to be aggressive; obsessive gardening;  and so on.

So much for middle-class values.

Well, that’s what they get for listening to their social “superiors”. Madness is clearly infectious.

Being gang stalked is like being forced back to childhood. Statusless, powerless  and surrounded by idiots.