A life of retreats

It was how I was raised – to be risk averse. Don’t make trouble, don’t hang out with trouble-makers/trouble venues, when trouble presents walk away.

At school, bullies tried it on. I retaliated immediately, forcefully. Immediately the teacher would appear and the bullies said I started it and I got the blame.

Next time it happened I didn’t retaliate. I waited for the bullies to do something they couldn’t wiggle out of.  I waited. The bullies waited. No teacher arrived. The bullies in the end walked away. Their game was to start something then make their victim take the blame.

In my teens, in peasant Northern Ireland the street harassment from men started. You couldn’t go through a week without being harassed for simply walking down the street. When I was feeling low I thought very seriously about going out.

As a teen when I started to experiment with dressing up, the harassment amplified, and men started to follow me. I back-tracked quickly, not bothering with my appearance. That stopped the stalking and minimised the street verbal abuse.

I went out with my first boyfriend aged 16. He couldn’t keep his hands to himself. I tried to figure out what was the culturalky accepted method to politely indicate to a male to respect minimal personal boundaries. I couldn’t think of any. I realised if you go out with boys that is what they expect. If anything happens, I am the one who bears the consequences and gets the blame. I never sought to go out on a date again.

Out of the blue a friend asked me if I had been sleeping with a different boy. I was shocked. He was someone I was friendly with, that was it. But in Northern Ireland at that time, in common with all peasant societies, if a woman is viewed as “loose” she becomes fair game. A male had been enhancing his own reputation on the basis of lies and putting me at risk in the process, and damaging my reputation in any case. I became cautious about any social interaction with men. After all, I had only talked to him.

In one of my first jobs a superviser arranged for everyone in the small office to be away and spent the entire afternoon pestering me for sex. After that I was cautious about where I worked, avoiding situations where I would be alone with a man.

When I went to university I was stalked by strangers. This was a mystery as I was too poor to socialise and met very few students. In addition where I lived was out of the way and not easy to find.

Often when I found a suitable place with good neighbours, other working or retired people, a disruptive person would move in and drive the good neighbours away with noise, vandalism and bringing numerous shady characters to the house.

So, this pattern recurred. Attack – retreat. I retreated at school, in the community, at work, yet still got intimidated in my own home.

When women are harassed, abused, attacked, raped and murdered there is always this undercurrent. Was she “looking for trouble”?  Was she dressed like a pro? Did she hang out in venues where sexual predators hunt? Was she naive in her social associations?

So this is my experience. Male bullies, older and total strangers, sought me out at school, and the teachers didn’t act against them. The social norms of North Irish peasant society does not condemn men for misogyny and abusing women in public. Male sexual pests at work are protected. I am not pretty and have never done anything to enhance my attractiveness. I avoided pick up joints. I chose carefully where I lived – yet from childhood, through teens, through adult life in every setting – the street, at university, at work and in my own home I have been stalked, hounded and persecuted by men – mostly total strangers.

Women are not attacked because they did anything wrong. My experience proves to me that men are the problem. Society has no interest in the problem. Women are abused, socially excluded and attacked for no other reason than they are women.

Why is this not included under Hate Crime?

 

 

Why do gang stalkers target the “upright men?”

If only criminals admitted their crimes. If only gang stalkers would put their hands up and say who they are and why they are doing it. But the victims of the gang stalking crimes are in the same position as all other crime victims. Left sorting out the damage with no idea who is attacking them  or why.

Without any help from the authorities, with the outright denial by the authorities that gang stalking exists (they have been forced to admit that black listing exists. Sometimes they admit that police corruption exists. They admit that stalking exists. That grooming exists. That slander exists. Sometimes they can even be forced to admit that paedophilia exists. They acknowledge while dragging their feet that whistleblower reprisals exist. They admit that Scientologists “Fair Game” whose methods are identical with gang stalking exists. But no, according to the government gang stalking absolutely does not exist even though these methods were historically used by the Stasi and the KKK. And then  they have the gall to accuse gang stalking targets of suffering a delusion. But if you repeat a lie long enough …

So victims of gang stalking, Targeted Individuals are left guessing who is doing what to whom and why.

The Targets of gang stalking are the best clue. No, it is not upper class males of the ruling power elite. Yes it is the same  people in society who are constantly dumped on by their “superiors”.

The majority of Targets are working class women and ethnic groups. The second largest groups are gays. And the smallest group, which stands out because at first glance there seems to be no reason why they are targetted are the unique group dubbed “the upright men”.

That working class women, people of colour and gays are targetted seems no surprise. This just looks like classism, sexism/misogyny and homophobia have just gone underground, officially denied and publicly condemned but now continuing in secret with the same old persecution and denial of full citizen status.  That feminists are targetted also makes sense on a simple women-hating basis.

But as people who know about gang stalking have often noted, gang stalking employs a great deal of resources. How it is being financed has been one question not satisfactorily answered. This is one of the features that imply state involvement.

The targetting of lower class women and gays resonates with a sexual message. These particular targets suggest a sexual motive, and as the criminal sexual industry is very lucrative, this suggests a credible motive for gang stalking. The methods of slandering the woman especially the slander that she is a prostitute, then separating her from her family, friends and social support, denying her work or harassing her out of work, setting her up for sexual attack strongly suggest sexual grooming behaviour and the methods  sexual traffickers use to trap their victims. Gang stalking could be, among other things, coercive recruitment into prostitution. When you consider the insatiable market for porn and prostitutes obviously the major problem for the criminal industry is recruiting women where virtually no woman has any wish to be enslaved, and viciously sexually exploited to make somebody else rich. Coerced recruitment characterises the industry.

The Targeted Individual A K Forwood, proposed the theory that surveillance in the Targets homes was likely being sold over the internet to the insatiable porn market. This would tie in with the sex trafficker theory.

This theory – that gang stalkers are sex traffickers – then makes the choice  of targets perfectly clear. Poor women. Gay men. Feminists because many feminists work for charities which provide shelter for abused and homeless women. They are protecting the vulnerable targets.

And the last, mysterious group turns out not to be so mysterious after all.

The upright men – who protect women and of their nature cannot be blackmailed, coerced or bribed.

Change of title, change of theme

Hey ho, another day, another hassle.

Just brought up my “Gang Stalking Mysteries” blog to discover my header had been altered from the poster “I am also a Russian Spy” to the default theme in abstract garish orange and reds.

I belong to that generation who are not computer savvy. It was months before I figured out how to customise the header, and I thought the result was rather cool and reflected the concept of the blog perfectly.

So I call up the customise tool and try to bring my “I am also a Russian Spy” header back. No go. The set up says my header has been changed, but then doesn’t do it.

So in order to get rid of the garish reds I decide to alter the theme, to something more suitable with fewer options for interference? meddling? sabotage?

I settle on a new theme which looks good, but then find the title is bizarrely presented – Gang stalking myster-    and on the next line  -ies.

Well, that will wow the audience.

After bumbling around trying to find how to prevent illogical word splitting I gave up and decided to shorten the title to “G??G Stalking”. So far WordPress or whatever, have not hyphenated it.

I can console myself  with the thought that “gang stalking” does not exist but so far government writers of our dictionaries  who tell you that words mean something completely different from what they actually do and other concepts that there are words for, don’t exist, have so far not attempted to tell the public that stalking does not exist. Although they are still trying to tell the public despite the evidence accepted by everyone else in the country that “blacklisting” does not exist.

The government still allows the public to acknowledge the existence of bullying in schools (although authorities have the habit of denying it is happening in any particular instance); bullying at work (ditto for bullying in schools with the added oftentimes that the victim is imagining it); harassment by neighbours (keep telling us about it and we’ll keep ignoring it until we get fed up and accuse YOU of being the problem); slander (only for rich people who can afford to sue); sex perverts next door (well they have to live somewhere, why not beside you); corrupt police (we’re working on it); framing (what corrupt police do); gagging (when you are victimised by the authorities you’re not allowed to talk about it, and neither are the press); censorship (same as gagging);  Identity Theft (major growing crime largely ignored by the media. It’s your problem to sort out); psychiatric hospital (not for the mentally ill. Reserved for people who disagree with the government’s version of reality); whistleblowers (don’t need them really); vigilantes (one rule for us, different rule for them); KKK (all gone now, never happened); Nazis (ancient history); Mafia (they live in Sicily, don’t they?); organised and white collar crime ( yeah, yeah but what the public really want to hear about is the spotty adolescent who threw a stone at somebody’s cat); political corruption (we have an excuse); brain washing (no, we absolutely don’t do it, No! No! No! – we’re just sending psych people into Job Centres to help the poor deluded fools who can’t find jobs – they are looking in the wrong place. Try India).

Hell’s bells, I could fill several pages of government twaddle as they assert this and deny that, and tell us they are working on the problem. It will be fixed some time next century, probably towards the end.

A friend once remarked that I was “abnormally” sane. It comes from following the advice a wise old man who really understood Ireland and Irish politics gave me. “If you start trying to understand how mad people think, by the time you understand you will be as mad as they are”.

Mad people can do your head in all at once in a crash course or by slow, gently sliding degrees – the slowly boiling frog. Either way, if you follow them, you end up nuts.

It bothers me when the government is sending psychiatrists to deal with the public in Job Centres at public expense having decided to only remember AUSTERITY when it suits them, when it looks like it is the government who need psychiatric help.

Transactional analysis from the insane – I’m OK, you’re all mad.

Or as an Irishwoman remarked proudly when watching her son marching out-of-step at a parade “They’re all out of step but my Johnnie”.

So, Gang Stalking Mysteries becomes G??G Stalking.

Who knows. Perhaps there are victims of stalking out there who didn’t realise they were being gang stalked.

Perhaps there are victims of blacklisting, slander, neighbour harassment, bureaucratic disservice, dishonest businesses, mobbing, vandals, anti-social pests, bullying, discrimination, prejudice, and general abuse everywhere they go, who do not realise they are being gang stalked. In fact being treated to all the worst features of racism, sexism and homophobia which are not supposed to exist anymore and against which the authorities pretend to take a strong stand. (But don’t mention classism – that doesn’t count).

Perhaps the gang stalkers who outnumber the gang stalking targets by ratios of hundreds to one will wake up from their cult-induced insanity and realise that they have been conned by people in authority/posing as people in authority, and they are all stalkers.

That our Pied Piper governments are all leading us a merry dance over a cliff.

 

image

 

 

 

There’s no such thing as “gang stalking” the authorities say. Perhaps we are using the wrong word. How about “framing”.

Have the authorities heard of “framing”? That practice of corrupt police sometimes working in collusion with criminals to shelter the criminals crimes.

Consider the methods used against the target. Someone either having or pretending to have official credentials freely criminally defames the target who is innocent of any crime. Coincidentally the police are allowed to slander people. The slanders spread are that the person is a drug user or dealer, prostitute, paedophile, jail bird, mentally unbalanced, terrorist – any combination or all to shock the dupe about to be recruited into cooperating with activities directed at the target.

Example. How do you think shop staff would behave if someone official “tipped them off” that a particular person is a shop lifter? Naturally they would follow that person about. They would scrutinise what they bought and what they put in their shopping basket. It might even be suggested to them that they get in that shopper’s way constantly to “put the wind up them” to let them know they are being watched. Honest shop workers will gladly do this viewing it as part of doing their job and grateful for the tip – except they’ve been lied to. They are the ones being played.

I have never shoplifted nor stolen anything in my life. My parents were honest to the point of being ridiculous. My mother’s father had been a policeman for a time. My mother taught me to always avoid ambiguous situations. Never permit grey areas. Never do anything that an onlooker putting an unfavourable interpretation on it could make out you were doing something wrong. When in shops keep your bags closed and don’t open them. Carry any item you intend to buy away from your body, obviously visible. Stay in the middle of the aisles away from the produce. Don’t wear concealing clothes.  Her training has proved priceless now I have discovered I am a target of gang stalking. I never do anything at any time which would contribute even to an appearance of guilt. So those seeking to frame me have to do all the running.

So the government, authorities, whatever deny the existence of gang stalking. I apologise. I should not have called it gang stalking. I should have called it by its correct name – framing.

Now what advice does the government/authorities have for working class women, people of colour, gays who are being framed, blacklisted, mobbed at work, stalked by perverts, slandered, persecuted by noisy, anti-social, criminal neighbours, denied service, wrongly billed, harassed, and lied to by officialdom?

Don’t be shy, after all, gang stalking does not exist.

A lifetime of social exclusion, harassment, discrimination and stigmatisation

1950’s

– bad service from shopkeepers. Defective product and put to back of queue

– interest in art sabotaged

– achievements down played by teachers, faults magnified. Sabotage of possible achievements.

– persecution by teacher (year long), including inciting bullying by class

1960’s

-bad service from shopkeepers. As above

– bad service from hair dressers

– street sexual harassment, most days (going to school, going shopping. Completely standard activities)

– sexual molestation on public transport and cinema. Frequent, causing adaptive reaction.

– sexual molestation attending First Aid class

– social exclusion following leisure interests – conservation group, chess club

-withholding teaching by teachers, both at school and at night classes

– harassed out of work

– needed support taken away in workplace

1970’s

– sabotage and manipulation of relationships

– numerous attempts to sexually seduce

–  sexually harassed out of work

– left with no work to do in another job

– harassed by flat sharers

– friend burgled. Attempt made to frame another friend for the crime

– noise persecution by neighbour

– poisoned in a restaurant

– stalked by strangers

– slandered to relatives

– unwarranted police attention on fabricated grounds

– policeman gives me a pile of (unwanted) confiscated porn mags . Give them away when suspect landlord is coming into the flat to read them.

– policeman asks inappropriate questions about my sex life, and suggests “dressing up”

– slandered at university, causing social exclusion

– “nut-jobs” constantly shoved at me

– friendships lost through slander. Manipulation of friendships.

– manipulated into social contact with communists and Republican sympathisers

– people I baby-sit for start getting phone calls from an IRA family. They move away.

– attempt to manipulate seduction by higher social class man (contraception not easily available at this time)

– stalked by numerous strange men at accommodation causing one neighbour to sell up and the other to get a guard dog

– denied post-graduate application before taking finals. Grades up to then 2:1’s

– husband of a friend commits suicide

– prevented from obtaining employment. Police meddling apparently.

– have to move when landlord dies

– sexual harassment at accommodation

– obtained a job and police appear and talk to manager, who starts to ask strange questions

– friends burgled

– police stop parents when out driving, for no reason

– parent forced out of work

– then harassed in next job, which shortly after goes out of business

-parents see man with gun hanging around field at back of their house. Move house

– subjected to sexual assault while doing voluntary charity work. Risk of pregnancy, not on contraception.

1980’s

– at temp agency it is implied my qualifications are fraudulent

– potential employers NEVER require documentation of my qualifications

– job interviewer suggests a period of unemployment on my CV due to being in prison

– one employer who has evidently heard the slanders about me finds it hilarious

– then an ex? policeman is employed in the office, and he is a real creep. (Shows photos of naked people to the students for one example).

– people at work know details of my private life they have no way of knowing

– next job, office under-staffed and over-loaded with work

– next job, my purse is stolen by someone at work

–  harassment at accommodation. (By Muslims. In retrospect it seems likely they were reacting on the slanders spread about me)

– local shopkeepers told slanders about me

– on an educational course harassed (Again by Muslims, as above)

– relationship interfered with. Boyfriend swindled out of his life’ s savings.

– boyfriend has a riot outside his restaurant. Police don’t come until hours after the crowd has dispersed then treat him and his staff like criminals.

– boyfriend, very agitated, warns me to stay away from Muslims “they kidnap women”. (Boyfriend, Asian, Hindu).

– women at work carry on loud conversations about my supposed private life. Their information is incorrect, but stigmatising.

– at another job, female staff follow me to the loo.

– stalked by weirdos at next accommodation

– rapists are moved into the flat below. They rape a simple minded girl they lured.

– when they leave they are replaced by a wife batterer. When I move around my flat (I am light on my feet, don’t wear shoes indoors, carpeted floor) I am yelled at.

– stalked by strangers at next accommodation. They attempt to break in on two occasions.

– more verbal garbage from women at work (different job to above)

– everyone in the office freezes when I say “Hullo” to the high school student on work experience.

– Legal assistant, ex-policeman tells me they defended a man they knew was guilty and got him off, and he was a badun.

– female staff always follow me to the loo.

1990’s

[Move to live in London with my husband. A bed-sit house. Completely normal residents you neither see nor hear then -]

– strange chap moves in below. At night sharpens a knife on the gate post.

– goes on holiday and moves friends in who are prostitutes

– at work it seems slanders have been spread about me. One of the scum in the office is disappointed to find I am NOT a prostitute nor drug dealer.

– employer and other work colleagues treat the lies with derision.

– noise pest moves in who drives other residents out.

– psychiatric nurse moves in who brings his work home – a patient who cries and moans all night. When he gets fed-up with him, shoves him out into the hall.

– the psychiatric nurse spends the night clunking about his room, opening and shutting cupboard doors, and switching taps on and off.

– the noise pest has a sound sensitive girlfriend who complains my husband is slamming doors (not true)

– an IRA man moves in and everyone in the house moves out

– the noise pest buys a flat for £75k. A man with no visible means of support.

– the landlord’s wife leaves him and takes the house. A mixed race family. He is left with the children, now disinherited.

– the house is turned into luxury flats.

2000’s

– the place we move to has extreme noise pests upstairs. Can’t hear our television even on top volume.

– he and his missus take turns over filling their baths, the water running through the ceiling in our kitchen

– we have to move when a fire upstairs destroys the building

– the landlord offers us to claim on his contents insurance, but we lost nothing due to the firemen, so we decline

– another bed-sit house with normal tenants, working and retired people then –

– the quiet cafe below changes ownership and becomes an all night disco. The high volume noise immediately below starts every evening at 6pm, usually running to 2 am, but sometimes all night.

The tenant above comes down to tell us to turn the noise down then realises it is from the floor below.

I write to the Council as to whether the premises are licensed for selling alcohol and all night opening hours and receive a fob off reply.

– the flat above was empty. The previous tenant had died. The new tenants are extreme noise pests – clunking around, banging things down, slamming doors and cupboard doors. The tenant above them moves out due to the noise and offers us his flat. When we move the noisy restaurant changes ownership and becomes normal.

– the house next door sold up because of the noise – they had an autistic child – and next door was extended and converted into luxury flats.

– a new tenant moves in below. After a few months she moves out and another tenant moves in. A friend of this tenant takes over another flat. Out of those two flats the tenants keep changing. So they must be occupying other addresses.

– those tenants, African migrants, use multiple names, using every variation on spelling and sex possible. The address is also being used as a mail drop for about a dozen people who don’t live there.

– our mail is stolen

– on a doctor’s appointment the secretary tells me I am not registered with them. The Doctor appears, very flustered. I had been her patient for more than 10 years. She apologised. “Somehow” she said, ” my medical records had been sent to another part of London”.

– the new tenants leave the communal door open at all times. They keep breaking the security gate.

– going to work one morning, before 6am I noticed that the door to our previous flat was open. Our landlord used to repaint and recarpet before new tenancies, so I looked round the door to see what he had done with the place. But the room was occupied. There was an African girl standing there, but there were no possesions in the room. I apologised, saying I did not know the room was occupied.

– at a later date that girl was attacked. She came crying to the first African tenant who roughly told her to go away.

– that same tenant, the first one, stopped my husband and myself on the landing and told us she had just had a baby. We were astonished. She was a small woman who certainly hadn’t looked pregnant.

– later as I was entering the flats a middle aged, not very bright African woman was talking to the staff at the restaurant downstairs. She was telling them she had just had a baby, but she didn’t have it anymore.

– the baby came and went.

– there was a serious fire among the dustbins at the back. The house owner backing us was seriously upset.

– a fire was started in the flat next door. The house was evacuated. My husband was recovering from cancer and was still very weak, so he sat in the ambulance. The tenants of the flat where the fire started walked past us, clothed in what looked like a collection of shoelaces.

– the ground floor tenant was repeatedly flooded by over flowing baths from the floor above.

– the flats were upgraded. Eventually it was the rent which priced us out of London. We had the smallest studio costing us over £9k a year. The other  flats, twice the size of ours but still small were going for more than £1,000 a month, paid for by Housing Benefit.

2010’s

We moved to Yorkshire to find affordable accommodation. Within a year my husband’s cancer returned.

I suspected he was not getting correct medical treatment and medical staff were acting  in a way which I knew from previously working for Social Services, indicated suspicion of carer abuse. Diving through the door without knocking, arriving in pairs – But when I was subjected to bizarre behaviour from a relative  I enquired on Wikepedia reference desk, who told me the behaviour was gaslighting. In researching gaslighting I found “gang stalking” which indicated that all the above listed events were not coincidences, but orchestrated harassment. Some describe it as police harassment, tactics police use to frame people.

Far from being paranoid, it is obvious I was not paranoid enough. I just supposed the Northern Irish people were disgusting people with the manners of pig-ignorant peasants, and if you live in London you are choosing to live in a rubbish environment packed full of crooks, nutters and anti-social gits.

This isn’t everything that happened. It is hard to remember everything.

But there are things about the situation which don’t add up. The gang stalking protocol, with supposed police involvement, which appears to me to be the case, does not seem a reasonable activity if its sole purpose is just to harass the target. What legal justification is there for the police to harass law abiding citizens? It does not explain landlords being afflicted with anti-social tenants who systematically vandalise the property with flooding and arson. It does not explain people being harassed into selling their houses which are then modernised and re-let at luxury rents. It does not explain landlords losing their houses, and businesses closing down or changing ownership. It does not explain businesses previously providing excellent service at reasonable prices suddenly upping their prices and providing bad service – to everyone. Gang stalking if it is being carried out by police and/or security services,  appears a thin veneer for activities which more closely resemble mafia-type organised crime.

And it appears that as a target I have been used as bait, a foot in the door, the excuse for con artists to make contact with their real objectives – landlords, businesses, employers, legal,  professional, banking and medical staff.

How many businesses closing, how many landlords losing their houses then turned into luxury accomodation does it take before you can say without being accused of being “paranoid” that yes, this absolutely matches the description of gang stalking, and it also matches events you would expect to see with organised white-collar crime.

 

 

 

 

Gang stalking controllers = hate filled xenophobes. The Fourth Reich?

Like the great man said, “By their deeds ye shall know them”.

And who do gang stalkers hate? You have only to look at their targets. The first apparent targets – women, predominantly working class and ethnic women. Homosexuals. Ethnic groups. These people are the target bait for trapping the main targets, small business people, landlords, businesses of all sizes and professionals such as lawyers and medical staff.

So when you consider ALL the targets, it appears to be everybody who is not a member of the ruling elite – which leaves only one group who can be responsible for gang stalking.

Their agenda then is patently obvious. The process of gang stalking results in obtaining power over people and resources, which coincidentally, are the same over-riding objectives of the ruling class. Taking all power and wealth in society to themselves.

Along with their power and wealth grab their attitude to the people they exploit is reflected in their methods. These are the prime xenophobes in society. the greatest repository of irrational hatred directed at women, homosexuals, working class, ethnic groups, middle class, business class. So gang stalkers are not only misogynist, homophobes, racist and classist, they possess a bigotry unique to themselves – elitist.

Gang stalkers possess a feudal overlord mind-set. In more recent history the Nazi superman mind set. Anyone who is not part of their elite super-class are viewed as legitimate prey. Sub-humans.

Think of the Nazis. Only 3 classes in the world. Themselves, the over-lords. The people they tolerate as slaves. And the remainder – dead – after being robbed, experimented on and worked to death.

The absence of any ethics in gang stalking is a clear indicator. Gang stalkers not only mock people, they mock every value that sustains human life. Trust, honour, decency, honesty, innocence, affiliation, professional integrity, protection, support, parental values.

Many gang stalking target-baits have commented on the gang stalkers exploitation of children. How parents using their own children in a gang stalking spoof will be putting those children at risk of harm. Don’t they realise what this means? A parent who puts their child in harms way in an outrageous sketch can only be doing so because they fear worse harm is guaranteed to the child if they don’t.

Looks to me that the Fourth Reich is on the way.

All those history books are suddenly very relevant.