That’s it folks.
One set of lies to one set of people; another set of lies to another set of people; and a third set of lies to a third set of people.
That is the gang stalker/espionage method. And the priority is to keep all the separate parties separate. So they don’t compare stories and realise they have been conned.
Like my tee-shirts?
The problem for the gang stalking target, the gang stalker’s bait, is that while everyone is talking about you, no-one will listen. Why would anyone listen to what a criminal/crazy says, when a “person in authority” has told them that that person is a criminal/crazy.
Until I started wearing my tee-shirts with such slogans as; bait; targeted-individuals (army veterans; vigilante stalking cults; beware white-collar fraudsters; etcetera, I would be followed in public, in cafes, in the library, on buses, by well-meaning idiots, mostly women clearly not in the Einstein bracket, carrying on loud and inane conversations including details of my private life which no-one not really close to me would know. Such riveting secrets as I get up really early in the morning (working for the Royal Mail for twenty years does that to you), and place-name dropping about Australia (my late Mum was an aussie), and Tooting, (suburb in London where I used to live). The dear ladies all engrossed in the adventure of their lives. Who would guess they were playing James Bond.
All this stopped when I started wearing my tee-shirts with the deliberately cognitive dissonance producing messages. Aren’t the authorities famously stringent against vigilantes? Do the dupes know what the military/espionage term “targeted individual” means? If not look up the British Army vets site – targeted-individuals – they will tell you. Are you familiar with how cults recruit – with lies. And the victim is the recruit who is reduced to slavery with the use of mind-bending/brain-washing techniques and is then fleeced. So check out “Fair Game” and notice the similarities. But even a good teacher can’t get through to thick pupils (sigh) and the gang stalker recruits are being conned by experts.
So when the dummies stopped following me, they were replaced by rather annoyed looking military/police types.
My latest favourite tee-shirt, “I am also a Russian spy” has set up a spate of “clue-dropping” all over internet sites I frequent. Allusions to “witness protection” and “You have the right to remain silent. Shut up”.
Umm. Witness protection. Haven’t heard of that gang stalker ruse before. Because, obviously, someone who was under witness protection would be acting completely irrationally, (with the implication they might need to be locked up “for their own protection”) by drawing attention to themselves.
Patrick McLaw anyone?
HOW ARE GANG STALKERS FOLLOWING ME?
This question appeared on my search engine. It is a fundamental question. The only possible answers suggest state involvement.
Consider these situations. More than forty years ago I listened to conversations among Women’s Aid helpers baffled about how some of their women who had moved across country and severed all former ties to family and friends were still located by stalking ex-husbands or boyfriends who magically turned up outside the shelter, which itself had a concealed address.
Also many women stalked by ex-partners find their stalking by an individual morphs into organised vigilante stalking in their community.
Targets of organised vigilante stalking find moving makes no difference. Even if they move to a different country they are still stalked.
Trade Unionists put on blacklists, (UK) compiled many of them believe with the assistance of police and security services, found they could not get work anywhere in the country, wherever they went. This can only be done with access to confidential records and the existence of a data base, where action against the Target is triggered when their identifying details are located. In the case of Trade Unionists their blacklisting was triggered when their employer checked their name and National Insurance number with a register of blacklisted workers. The company that maintained the register, and who were unconcerned whether or not the details on it were correct, collected fees for their information. That company also included names of environmentalists.
The business which was carried on in secret, meets anyone’s definition of a “conspiracy”. A conspiracy of employers. Some of the blacklisted Trade Unionists believed the blacklisting business was carried out with the cooperation of the police and security services. The Trade Unionists were not blacklisted on reasonable grounds such as being incompetent or trouble makers. They were usually good workers who took on the role of Trade Union Health and Safety representatives to address dangerous work situations. The construction industry is inherently dangerous with an annual catalogue of fatalities, maimings and long-term health risks (such as exposure to asbestos). It seems strange that a government which has extended Health and Safety legislation in every walk of life is indifferent to real Health and Safety issues in a dangerous industry.
What is going on here? It is illegal to discriminate in employment against people on the basis of colour, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation, and as far as I know employers are not allowed to bar ex-criminals (excepting offences of sex or violence from some occupations), yet there is no law which prohibits discrimination against ordinary, law-abiding members of the public, who have been arbitrarily slandered by “somebody”? Such a shame libel and slander are not criminal offences when they can be used to prevent individuals from obtaining employment.
Organised community vigilante stalking must be being carried out in a like manner to blacklisting. That there exists a secret register of targets which is triggered whenever a name appears on official documentation of some kind. Who has access to confidential records in any bureaucracy?
The scale of organised vigilante stalking is such that the only possible candidates for carrying it out are the police, the security services, clandestine companies operating “lists” or organised crime, and any combination of these is also possible.
WHY GANG STALKING?
There are two possible objectives for the targeting. Most targets are women. The second largest category is homosexual men. The result of being denied employment or harassed out of employment is usually financial destitution, which is a major cause in forcing women into prostitution with or without her consent. The gang stalkers spread the lie that the woman is a prostitute to help the process along. Some Targets of gang stalking have suggested that surveillance footage of Targets in their own home is used as pornographic material, made without the consent or knowledge of the Targets, and used to support the lie that the target is a prostitute as well as for financial gain. And prostitution is a major world-wide criminal racket which supplies an insatiable market raking in billions – but not for the women.
The other objective appears to be recruiting dupes into the gang stalking cult, where their lives will be controlled and the institutions they work for infiltrated and ultimately controlled by the stalkers. I arrived at the conclusion that Targets are bait when I noticed the large number of people associated with me over a lifetime had suffered huge financial losses, in the case of landlords, lost their houses and in the case of businesses changing their character completely from being well-run businesses offering a good, reliable and reasonably priced service to unreliable, shoddy and expensive. Once the gang stalkers have got their foot in the door they ease out the reliable staff replacing them with their own people. They appear to favour migrants who are more exploitable, accepting harsh working conditions for low pay and are more accepting of corruption as normal compared with their countries of origin. The financial bleeding of the individual and business targets is usually carried out very slowly over years. Timing of the final sting is carefully calculated to conceal the process. A lot of attention is paid to disrupting communication between people who might otherwise figure out what is happening. The end result the landlord loses his houses and the business, after being run into the ground, changes ownership.
Gang stalking resembles a mafia-run racket more than anything else, exploiting access to confidential records to identify targets to fleece and the means to do it.
Gang stalkers corrupt everything they touch.
Everyone with exploitable resources is the gang stalkers’ potential target.
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
Whether “authorities” are involved, authorities steadfastly deny gang stalking is occurring. This does not make sense that anyone can categorically claim that a wide-ranging collection of criminal and anti-social behaviours which everyone knows occurs, are not happening, when they are all happening together. Wholesale, unified denial across all authorities, all institutions could not happen without overall control.
It is open to conjecture whether or not “gang stalking” is happening. What is not open to conjecture is the conspiracy of silence.
Gangstalkers use staged provocation to make you look bad. In most cases it is best to ignore the bizarre behaviour – don’t respond and move away, otherwise it will look as if you are the “trouble-maker”.
The following are examples from my own experience.
An infant, aged about 4, but a precocious type, advances on me in a supermarket aisle, as I stand in front of the meat section. His father/guardian is with him and looks and has the mannerisms of a social worker or teacher. The aisle is the wrapped meat counter and the child is sitting on the display. Gets up moves a couple of steps and sits again. This is repeated continuously as he advances towards me. His father says nothing, but is watching me. It seems he is being trained to provoke adults. I don’t respond. When he reaches me he plainly expects me to move out of his way. I remain standing in place. He looks at his father for guidance who just nods at him to walk around me.
You can see any response I might have made could have been manipulated in a number of ways. It could have been used to escalate a situation. Once the situation started the other party could lie to his heart’s content about what happened and he would have been believed as he was obviously middle class and I am working class. Or what if I complained to a member of staff who did not witness the incident and the father denied that any such thing had happened? This could have been turned into a gaslighting situation where I would look like a weirdo suggesting that such bizarre behaviour had happened while the perfectly respectable seeming father denied it.
It was also a beautifully framed double bind. What kind of person does not find it offensive for a child to keep putting his bottom on products that other customers are going to buy afterwards, in ignorance of the child’s behaviour? But the bottom line is (sorry, couldn’t resist it) a child with a parent is the parent’s responsibility, and after that the shop staff. The days are long gone when any adult could correct any child’s aberrant behaviour. And it has never been acceptable to correct a child whose parent is present. That is their responsibility.
A different occasion a different shop. As before an adult with a child, this time an older child. This time I am in the patisserie section where the cakes displayed are uncovered. The child pushes in front of me and with his father immediately beside him proceeds to push his finger into each cake, one after another. Again the father is silent. I say nothing and walk away.
Even though on both occasions I adopted a course of action likely to lead to least harm, even that response could be used against me. Gang stalkers spread rumours and lies. They could still lie to bystanders/members of staff that I was the wife of those men, and how disgusting that I did not stop the children’s bad behaviour making me seem to be responsible for behaviour that had nothing to do with me and was staged. A clever gaslighting situation where any response of mine could be used to make me look bad.
I am in the library and a mother pushing a pram and with two young children comes and stands immediately behind me. The children start shrieking and stampeding up and down immediately behind me. This happened on two occasions in different parts of the library, different woman, different children. In both cases my situation in the library – I was working on a computer – there was no reason for the children to position there. The mother was not talking to anyone. She wasn’t using a computer and they weren ‘t near any books. Also the librarians desk was a few feet away and the librarian ignored them. This library has a superlative children’s section in a separate room. It was the mother’s job to see her children behaved properly in a library setting, or failing that, the librarian. Any reaction on my part could either have been used to escalate a situation or make it seem there was some connection between myself and those people.
Again in the library working on a computer, a young woman with a girl about 7, sits at the computer beside me. The girl sits on the desk virtually in my lap. Not a lot I could do about it. Perhaps I should carry thumb tacks to spread on my desk or sticky fly tape.
Children, usually boys aged about 10, in school hours and in term time sit beside me at the computers in the library, even though there are many empty seats elsewhere. As I mentioned, this library has an excellent childrens room, also equipped with computers. What can you do to keep children away? As a result of this nonsense with children in the library I bought an ipad with a cheap contract and now work from home.
Gang stalker controllers make their recruits engage in bizarre and anti-social behaviour. Truancy is harshly dealt with these days but not when gang stalkers take children out of school as actors in their charades. Not only are gang stalkers happy to exploit children, and train children to be pests and anti-social but you can see in the situations I have described, that other innocent members of the public are subjected to filthy and annoying behaviour too. Brought to you by people in “authority”. It demonstrates clearly the total contempt our elite have for anyone in society, including middle class, who do not belong to their elite group. That they readily treat people and our children as pawns in their sick and perverted games.
In an earlier blog I told how I discouraged the street theatre by crowds of idiots, by wearing t-shirts with some of the following written on:- BAIT, GANG STALKERS BAIT, CON ARTISTS, PROFESSIONAL LIARS, TARGETED INDIVIDUALS, CULTS. The recruits don’t realise THEY are the Targets. We, the people falsely slandered as criminals are only the BAIT to recruit them. All the listed concepts the gang stalking recruiters really DON’T want their recruits to think about. They might realise they’re being gulled.
Some TI’s believe that along with the staging of events in public to support the various lies told about the Target Bait, the Targets are photographed and these photographs may be presented to others to reflect the TI in a bad light.
So do you think the stalker controllers will want to show your photo to someone they are trying to dupe with GANGSTALKERS BAIT written in large letters across your chest?
WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A HOUSE
. Criminals, criminal looking/acting types will move in. There will be a lot of noise.
. Neighbours will sell up and move. There will be a lot of building work as the newly changed ownership houses will be extended and renovated. Bed sits will be upgraded into expensive flats. Houses changed from bed-sit accommodation into expensive Guest Houses.
. The original house will change ownership and be upgraded.
Poor people, ordinary working people and retired people will no longer live in the area, having been priced out.
WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A HOTEL
. The previously high quality, reasonably priced service will gradually deteriorate.
. Long-term staff will leave. Jobs will be cut. New cheaper staff, often immigrants will be brought in as they can be made to work harder, longer, in worse conditions for lower wages.
. Previously high standards for food will deteriorate. Customers will complain about the quality and preparation. Broken facilities will be left broken. The place will become dirty.
. The highest tariff possible will be charged.
Local people who previously worked there will be forced to move away to look for work. Another good value hotel providing a good service to ordinary working and retired people, lost.
WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A BUREAUCRACY
. The business will become corrupted. An honest, reliable good service can no longer be relied on. Where the service deals with confidential records, confidentiality will be compromised. Essential documentation will be “lost” or information altered. Communication will be delayed, hampered or break down completely. The customer can no longer depend on the service and complaints will be ignored and fobbed off. Often the customer will be made out to be the problem.
WHEN GANG. STALKERS TAKE OVER A RETAIL OUTLET
. If possible, the shop will be extended and upgraded.
. Jobs will be cut, and opening hours increased. Long term local employees will often be laid off to be replaced by cheaper, more easily exploited migrants.
Workers will work longer hours, have more duties, will lose any “perks”.
. Cheap ranges of goods will be abandoned completely or greatly reduced. The shop will stock more high profit items. There will be little good value for the customer.
The end result will be jobs for local workers will be lost and those that remain will find their work conditions greatly deteriorated. The shop will price out many poor and lower income customers such as pensioners.
The infiltration of accommodation and businesses start when someone posing as or actually being a member of the police or security services, invites the cooperation of the landlord/business owner to cooperate with the surveillance and harassment of an ordinary member of the public whom he slanders with lies that that person is a dangerous criminal/terrorist/drug dealer/prostitute/paedophile.
The recruited person is then completely under the “authority’s” control and cannot tell anyone what is happening because it is “national security”.
Having observed the above consequences of gang stalking infiltration, and being the person lied about, I cannot see what the connection between the above consequences has got with “national security”.
Discussions about gang stalking revolve endlessly around the question who is doing it.
Some suggest mafia-type gangsters. Others the state espionage agencies. And others, criminal elements in the police.
The Target, the gang stalker’s bait, is an innocent member of the public. Working class, most often a woman, a gay man or member of an ethnic group.
The gang stalk recruiters use this person as bait to recruit other innocent members of the public, with the slander that that person is a serious, morally depraved criminal a terrorist/drug dealer or addict/prostitute/insane/paedophile. Members of the public, fearful of this dangerous person in their community gladly cooperate to practice surveillance and harassment of the target. They do not realise they have been inducted into a cult where they will be subjected to thought reform, enslaved, and leached of all they possess.
The bait, not only a target, becomes the scapegoat for the gang stalkers activities.
When the target bait moves into a house, the landlord/owner/agents will be approached with the lies and their cooperation requested. Anti-social elements will be moved into the house who will engage in apparently criminal activities; people dressed as prostitutes, and others who look like the stereotype of drug dealers, etc. There will be extreme noise nuisance. Neighbours will be informed of the new criminal element in their street and neighbours will sell up quickly at a low price, before the value of their property is trashed. Usually, the landlord loses his house.
All the while, people overlook they have been scammed and blame the target bait for their problems.
When you look at the situation this way, it becomes clear why the gang stalkers use an innocent, but low status member of the public as their bait.
If gang stalkers are criminals, their MO is to set people up for their crimes. Someone who cannot defend themselves. The perfect fall guy.
Espionage people, likewise, prefer to use dupes rather than their own people, so as to create a disconnect between an act and their responsibility for it.
Police also have a history of setting people up for crimes they did not commit and maligning the character of those they are setting up.
Mafia type criminals and police also have a long history of despising working class people, ethnic groups and sexploitation of lower class women whom they view with contempt, and whose lives they view as disposable.
A further reason for using an innocent member of the public rather than a real criminal, is that a criminal knows how criminals work and would identify criminal activity very easily. Criminals also have insight into how the police work. A criminal targeted in this way would figure out what was going on very quickly and make a fuss about it. It is against the law to harass someone who has served their sentence and there are some very active charities to protect ex-cons interests.
An unsuspecting member of the public, who has never committed a crime and has no knowledge of how criminals and police work will be baffled by the continuous nuisances occurring in their vicinity, but they will not connect it to criminal activity as they are not criminals, nor police activity, as they have done nothing to merit the attention of the Police.
And even after years of harassment and trying to find out what is going on, they can remain in ignorance due to the mainstream censorship of gang stalking activity.
As the people used for gang stalkers bait are women, gays and ethnics, if it should turn out that it is the state espionage agencies or police who are behind gang stalking, then the state itself is practicing racism, homophobia and sexism, although sexism is not a strong enough word to describe accusing ordinary women of prostitution, setting them up for sexual attack and acting so as to throw them out of normal employment. Telling everyone they are a prostitute won’t help their marriage prospects either .