Gang stalkers try to get their Targets to move from safe accommodation to unsafe accommodation where they can more easily be harassed/attacked




The following is from my own experience. I only recently discovered that I was a Target of gang stalking, but all through my life (I am in my sixties) I have had problem neighbours. When I found out about gang stalking I discovered why.


This house was a large old English mansion in a quiet street.  I shared with two other girls. It was peaceful – at first. Then a guy moved in. He took up carpentry as a hobby and he would wake the household in the middle of the night with hammering. One of the girls who was in a steady relationship, developed a “following” on top of that. Weird, strange guys would hang around in the kitchen waiting for her. When you went into the kitchen to make a meal they evidently expected you to make one for them too. The male never did any housework. His attitude was there were women in the house so they could clear up. I went down to breakfast one morning and every plate, bowl, cup, pan, were piled high in the sink, crawling with ants!

Did not feel safe there so I moved.

Shortly after the house was pulled down and a block of flats built on the site.


No longer sharing I needed a cheaper address. I found a tiny terrace beside a shop. It was on a main road and the traffic never stopped. Whenever there was a lull in the traffic the guy in the shop put his offensive music on at high blast. Continuous noise! You couldn’t think. The cottage kept getting infestations of insects. Ants. you would spray, get rid of the ants. then hordes of cockroaches. Spray, and the smell of the spray makes you feel sick – then the ants, and so on. Ants, cockroaches, ants, cockroaches.


The rent was double the terrace but it was worth it. A large flat in a quiet block in a quiet neighbourhood.


Lived with my parents prior to going to University. They moved house when they saw a man hanging around the fields at the back with a rifle.


Another quiet, safe house on a quiet street. The landlady was at the property most of the time as she was a keen gardener. A student moved in who was a non-stop babbler. I was going out to the pub every night just to get away from her. I couldn’t afford this extra expense so moved to a smaller place.


Very safe and quiet until – in a cul-de-sac on the edge of town, in the middle of the terrace with the landlord living next door and an alert neighbour on the other side. Then weird guys started hanging around the place. The neighbour became very fearful,  but the men stopped hanging around when the neighbour nearly shot a policeman climbing over his back fence.  Moved when the landlord died.


Rented a renovated attic room from a landlady. There was no lock on my flat. One night her boyfriend just appeared in my room. Left.


Large mansion type house again, in its own grounds, on a quiet street. Felt safe there, but after I had been there a local student moved in who gave the Warden a lot of trouble with noise. He also – I had very little to do with this person – took me aside to show me some curried kebabs he had made and put in the freezer. A week later he made a great fuss claiming someone had stolen his food. This was divisive. I was the only working class person in the hostel. All the foreign students were middle class. It was like he was saying -if something goes missing you know who to suspect. She’s not the same as us (not middle class).


Sharing a cheap flat in a quiet cul-de-sac. Again, at first quiet. Then coming back from shopping I saw a weird looking guy hopping over a neighbour’s wall. Went on to my flat. As my hands were full with shopping I rang my bell. When my flat mate answered he said “Hullo”. The weird guy was standing directly behind me, I had not heard him following.

When the flatmate moved out and I was on my own in the flat some  migrants moved into the flat underneath. They raped a local girl that they lured to their flat. When they moved out a couple moved in. The guy was evidently an abuser. He spent a lot of time screaming at his girlfriend and yelling at me when I moved around my flat. (I am light-footed). Did not feel safe.


Now in London shared a bedsit in a quiet house in a quiet street. The landlord was a relative and friend of my husband. There were 6 bedsits in the house and we neither heard nor saw our neighbours. The perfect neighbours! Then the situation changed. A weird guy moved in who would sharpen a large knife on the gate post at night. He left for a time and let some friends stay in his room, two prostitutes. The house had a continuous stream of freaks until the landlord ejected them and the original tenant.

A noise pest moved in who drove his immediate neighbour crazy with obnoxious, loud music for hours on end. Then he brought in a noise sensitive girlfriend who complained my husband slammed the front door when he went out. Not true.

A psychiatric nurse moved into the flat above and he would bring his work home – a patient/ex-patient who would cry and moan all night until the guy got fed up with him and put him out into the hall. When this wasn’t happening he was stamping around all night, banging cupboard doors and turning taps on and off.

Somebody attempted to post drugs to the house.

When an IRA man moved into the house all the tenants moved out. The landlord turned the reasonably priced bed-sits into luxury flats, and shortly after his wife left him taking the house.


This should have been a quiet, safe flat. But for the noise pest neighbours upstairs. They played their music so loud we couldn’t hear our television even at top volume. They took turns over filling their bath so that the water poured through the ceiling. When a fire started in their flat the building became unliveable. The building was renovated into modern flats with the insurance.


In retrospect it looks like my husband and I were forced to move from accommodation that was relatively safe and quiet and difficult to harass us in, to a property where our environment could be completely controlled and we could be harassed on all sides.

The flat was on a direct artery into London and the traffic NEVER stopped. At first the neighbours were lovely. A  quiet Portuguese restaurant underneath. The flat above empty. The previous tenant had died. A working man at the top of the house at work all day and a very quiet man beside, a Caribbean pensioner. The house on one side were quiet Indian neighbours.

Then it changed. The Portuguese restaurant closed and was taken over by people running an all-night disco. the music blasting at high volume started at  six pm and went on regularly to  two am, sometimes all night.

The quiet Indian neighbours sold up and moved away and their house was extended and renovated into pricey flats.

The noise pest from hell moved into the flat above. She seemed hyperactive and it was non-stop stamping about, banging cupboard doors, slamming objects onto tables or floors. Continuous intermittent percussive noise.

A woman with an abusive boyfriend moved into the other neighbouring house. He would break down the security door, and vandalise her property.  He could access our flat over an adjacent roof.  I complained to the letting agents about the cigarette ends which kept appearing on the roof outside our window. I thought the guy upstairs was dropping them from his window – a fire risk as a bitumen roof and summers are hot in London. They denied all knowledge. I only found out later about the abusive boyfriend.

Migrants moved in. They left the communal door open at nights and kept breaking the security gates. They would stay for a few months then there would be new faces. You never knew who was in the house.  The police kept calling but they denied knowing anything about the person enquired about. They used the address as a mail drop for people who did not live at the address. They used every variation on their names possible.

They drove another tenant from her flat by repeatedly flooding her with over filled baths.


When we were priced out of London we moved to Harrogate, North Yorksire. A quiet country town where the residents do not view the appalling behaviour you get in big cities as normal. Where odd behaviour stands out.

The stalking has continued, but the noise nuisance and appalling neighbours is not a problem.





How gang stalkers conceal their housing scams – noise

This idea is based on the theory that gang stalkers are engaged in property scams. When the Target Bait moves into a neighbourhood the gang stalkers follow and approach the landlord and neighbours telling them that the Bait is a dangerous criminal – drug dealer/prostitute/paedophile etc. To add credibility to their story they install people who look like, and behave like and maybe are criminals at the address where the Target Bait lives.

Of course the neighbours are immediately thrown into a panic because they fear for their personal safety and the safety of their families, and soon realise what effect this will have on the value of their house. The gang stalkers then offer to buy up the property.

So when a Target Bait moves into an area a lot of houses in the immediate neighbourhood of the address change ownership, sometimes have change of use, and a lot of building work follows as the gang stalkers maximise the value of the properties with extensions and improvements.

We all know from experience that building works, especially in suburban areas are a major noise nuisance and the cause of complaints from neighbours. So you would expect the gang stalkers activity to be exposed by neighbours complaining to the authorities, alongwith enquiring into why the renovations are taking place. But it does not happen. Why not? Because most of the long standing owners have moved away and those that remain have been told the noise is part of a deliberate campaign of harassment with the intention of driving the Target Bait (the person the gang stalkers are pretending is a criminal) out of the area.

So the gang stalkers can disrupt the neighbourhood and make all the noise they want without anyone complaining or drawing the attention of any authority to the situation.

Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life

A Targeted Individual made the comment that being gang stalked was like having an abusive husband without having married one.

There is a curious coincidence between the tactics of abuse of coercive control and the gang stalking formula.

1.   The abuser chooses his target and infiltrates into his victim’ life.

2.     He isolates the victim and immediately sets to breaking all her social ties/poisons her social relationships. He causes the victim to be stigmatised by spreading  lies so as to discredit her.

3.      He is a financial parasite/ predator attacking the victims ability to earn an income and wasting her resources.

4.      He attacks/ undermines the victim’s personality by undermining her interests whether intellectual/artistic/musical etc, by preventing or obstructing her from participation or demanding she re-prioritises her life according to her manipulator’s agenda. He destroys her autonomy and micro-manages her life.

5.      He attempts to reduce the victim to a domestic/sexual slave, dictating her appearance and behaviour.

6.     The victim is at risk of sexual assault/rape/physical attack and murder by her persecutor.

These methods are also used by cults, brainwashers, pimps, traffickers and owners of slaves. A common purpose is sexual exploitation often accompanied by great financial rewards for the perpetrator.  The majority of targets are women.

As the methods of coercive control and the gang stalking formula are identical, perhaps it is significant that women cannot simply avoid abuse from men by avoiding relating to them. Single, independent women are a major category of gang stalking target .  The end result is like racism, applied by men to women in general, regardless of whether they are in a relationship or not.

Battered Mothers - A Human Rights Issue

Coercive ControlDespite its great achievements, the domestic violence revolution is stalled, Evan Stark argues, a provocative conclusion he documents by showing that interventions have failed to improve womens long-term safety in relationships or to hold perpetrators accountable.

Stark traces this failure to a startling paradox, that the singular focus on violence against women masks an even more devastating reality. In millions of abusive relationships, men use a largely unidentified form of subjugation that more closely resembles kidnapping or indentured servitude than assault. He calls this pattern coercive control. Drawing on sources that range from FBI statistics and film to dozens of actual cases from his thirty years of experience as an award-winning researcher, advocate, and forensic expert, Stark shows in terrifying detail how men can use coercive control to extend their dominance over time and through social space in ways that subvert womens autonomy, isolate them, and infiltrate…

View original post 451 more words

The Gang Stalking Process

1.          Prevent the Target from getting work.

Failing that sabotage the Targets work and try to get them fired .  The method used here is gaslighting. Vandalising employers property that the Target is responsible for .  Harassing another worker, but make it look as if the Target is responsible.   Attempt to have the Targets pay reduced. Sabotage the Targets work.  By spreading lies manipulate other workers to sexually harass, gang up on, abuse or bully the Target (harassment by proxy).

(All the above were done to me at work. These techniques would have worked but for responsible management and work colleagues who rejected being manipulated. I WAS LUCKY.)

2 .           Prevent the Target from getting accommodation.

By spreading lies that the Target is a criminal.  If the Target gets accommodation harass them out with extreme, ongoing noise harassment; putting dangerous, criminal, anti-social neighbours in neighbouring flats; flooding them out; burning them out; pricing them out.

3.              Financial attacks.

Cause the Target to lose money by vandalising their property. If the Target rents, vandalise the landlords property that the Target rents, so that they will lose their bond. Devise ways to cheat the Target out of their money.

Devise ways to prevent the Target receiving their just entitlements – such as Welfare payments or pensions.

Devise ways to steal the Targets assets. Identity Theft can achieve both these objectives. Objective – to reduce Target to destitution.

4.              Criminalise the Target

Encourage the Target to commit a crime, such as making a false insurance claim. If the Target rejects criminal actions despite all encouragement, set them up for a crime they did not commit. Arrange for a crime to be committed and then fabricate evidence to make it look as if the Target is responsible.

5.               Spread the slander that the Target is insane.

Because of the gang stalking activity, odd things are occurring in the Targets vicinity all the time, as the Target is being subjected to gaslighting. The slander that  Target is insane provides a plausible explanation for the weirdness and attaches the blame for the occurrences to the Target .  If a situation is then manipulated to have the Target institutionalised in a mental institution (Patrick McLaw?) people have already been conditioned to think this is a normal event – they were lied to in advance that the Target was insane. This also means that nothing the Target says will be believed.

These cumulative, indirect attacks on the Target can prevent the person from getting work; get them sacked; make them homeless; deny them social support to which they are entitled; steal their assets; cause them to be raped/attacked; cause them to be falsely imprisoned/incarcerated in a mental institution.

Gang stalking Targets have suggested that the tactics used against them might be a form of social experiment – practice. Presumably to be applied on a large scale after the methods have been perfected.

Compare this gang stalking formula to the following article:-image


IF gang stalkers are state spies (financed by the taxpayer) they are fomenting hatred against groups such as blacks, gays and feminists

According to the authorities gang stalking is a myth, but they don’t/can’t deny that all the elements that combined comprise gang stalking do not exist – stalking, bullying, harassment, black listing, slander, vandalism, gaslighting, noise harassment, smear campaigns, lies, cult activities, manipulation, intimidation, police corruption, political corruption, framing, etc.

Also the targets of gang stalking are the same old – working class, especially working class women, black, gay, feminist.

The difference is today our governments have a huge shop window filled with ostentatious displays of  social inclusion, special favours to “minorities” , draconian penalties for unpolitically correct thought and words, and the star of the show “gay marriage” while in the back room the same old persecution is going on as before – only denied. Point this out and you are labelled insane.

Why are our governments fomenting hatred?

They need scapegoats for their bad policies causing destruction to our societies?

They are providing “legitimate” outlets for frustration onto helpless groups”

They are using “harassment by proxy” to get rid of those opposed to, and most likely to be damaged by their policies?

They are following the well trodden fascist agenda of exploiting/eliminating the weakest in society?

They are getting rid of potential opponents before those opponents recognise the need to get rid of THEM?

They are racists and homophobes who wish to eliminate blacks and gays?

Their fascist agenda demands that the working class are pushed into the gutter and kept there?

They want all women confined to domestic, sexual and reproductive roles and denied full adult citizen and socio-economic status? And working clas women reduced to prostitutes?

Perhaps there is no mystery attached to gang stalking at all – called gang stalking or any other name, it is what you get when fascists are in charge.



Why do residents keep breaking locks on security gates and communal doors?

1.    There are prostitutes at your multiple -occupancy address, and they want their customers to be able to access the residence as easily as possible .

2.    There are drug dealers at your multiple occupancy address and they want their customers to be able to access the residence as easily as possible .

3.     There are gang stalkers at your multiple occupancy address. They may or may not be committing the above crimes, but the story will have been spread to the neighbours that they are .

This may be in order to induce the neighbours to sell up at a bargain basement price to the gang stalkers.

If you are a female resident it may be to set you up to be raped .

One theory is that the gang stalkers are the police and/or security services. An innocent resident in the house may be being used as bait – lies are spread that they are a prostitute/drug dealer/paedophile, along with their address. Gang stalkers in the house leave the doors open so that potential customers/vigilantes can get in.

The probable intention is not to identify criminals but to recruit them to gang stalking .



The Theory that Gang Stalking Targets are Experimental Subjects

One of the theories of  some gang stalking methods is that Targets are experimental subjects. The implications being what is learnt can then be applied to other sections of the populace.

Techniques used against Targeted Individuals include the following.


Every opportunity is taken to expose the Target to as much low level, but continuous stress as possible.

Noise from the neighbours; bullying at work and awkward customers; rudeness from anyone the Target might have anything to do with; casual dismissing of legitimate complaints; bad service; inefficient bureaucracy, such as incorrect billing, but delaying and obstructing dealing with the complaint; and so on.

Any weakness the Target has will be exploited. People are annoyed by different things. The  Targets particular sensitivity will become the focus of aggravation.

At times in any of our lives events can happen which make us more vulnerable. Sometimes we can be driven to the edge and it will only take a feather to put us over the edge. Gang stalkers practice these techniques – both to amplify risk and stress in the Target’s life and also push them over the edge if possible. Driving a person into suicide is invisible murder.

A person ill or recently bereaved can be very upset by something that they could shrug off in normal circumstances.

Take my situation. My husband died last year. We had been together 20 years and it was a happy relationship. In a recent blog I described the interference I had been getting when typing on my computer. Among the random errors was one specific one. Every time I typed the word “bill” it came up with a capital letter. As “Bill” my late-husbands name. (No, it did not upset me. I grew up in  Northern Ireland surrounded by men whose social style was verbally abusing women at every opportunity, so I developed a thick skin from an early age). But it gives an insight into the mind of gang stalkers. On a scale of low life, how would you rate people who make a point of deliberately trying to upset someone recently bereaved?

I am making this point because it looks as if the practices of gang stalking are now being taken mainstream. The recent treatment of ill and disabled people by the DWP, show a formula targets of gang stalking are familiar with.

.       Letters informing of appointments, changing time of appointments, never arrive or arrive too late, either causing the recipient to miss a needed medical appointment or a DWP interview, with serious consequences for the recipient. . Somehow the law that proof of sending is not proof of delivery is being ignored. It is a gang stalking technique to interfere with mail delivery.

.         The consequences of bureaucratic ” mistakes” which are habitually denied, always have detrimental effects for the recipient, but no consequences for the perpetrator. The bureaucracy is rarely held accountable.

.          The bureaucracy denies receiving your letter or documents, or “loses” them.

.          The individual is treated as if they were a criminal or mentally infirm. When they tell the truth they are treated as if they are lying . They are treated like a piece of human garbage. Legitimate complaints are ignored or fobbed off. The bureaucrat may lie brazenly and when you complain accuse you of inventing the problem. You will be treated in an insulting manner to get you upset, then they will claim you are mentally unstable, or get annoyed, in which case they will claim you were threatening them .

One piece of good advice I saw on a blog was never interact with a bureaucrat alone. Always have a witness.

.          Your rights as a citizen will be treated as if they do not exist. They will attempt to deny you the financial help to which you are entitled.

.          Weaknesses will be mocked. Say you have trouble walking. They will employ some method to imply you are faking the problem . They will set up situations which undermine you dealing with your problem. This is a standard gang stalking tactic – deliberately rigging the situation to cause failure.

But back to stressing. Causing stress to elderly or ill people can worsen their problems and promote premature death.


Sensitising is designing a stressor specific to the Target. It is the psychological equivalent of continuously rubbing a raw wound on the same spot. The actual movement in itself is not violent , but it causes harm. Harming while appearing to not harm is a gang stalking tactic. Another word for this is teasing – like every time I type the word ” bill” the computer changes it to “Bill”, my late husband. The aggravation is specific and only meaningful to me.

The gang stalking tactic is to seek out an individuals Achilles heel, then keep kicking it.

Say a DWP claimant is a totally honest person. The person dealing with them persists in treating them as if they were a liar. The more the claimant protests their honesty, the more the bureaucrat insists they are a liar. As there is no way for the recipient of this technique to solve the situation, they become increasingly upset. And the bureaucrat pushes and pushes until they get a response that is so distressed that they can then claim there is something wrong with the claimant. I am saying, expect to be insulted. It is a tactic.

And it is a dirty tactic. Some people are more vulnerable than others.


An extension of sensitisation are nudges. When you have primed someone to be in a sensitised state, where they are very vulnerable and suggestible, you drop a prompt into the situation such as”Why don’t you kill yourself”.

Gang stalking targets have been saying for years that they think the gang stalking tactics employed against them were to force them to commit suicide.


Gang stalking targets have also claimed that they have been subjected to attacks on their finances – being denied welfare they were entitled to, or a pension, and subsequently driven onto the street.

Finally there is an article called “Autogenocide” which you might find of interest.