Why do gang stalkers target the “upright men?”

If only criminals admitted their crimes. If only gang stalkers would put their hands up and say who they are and why they are doing it. But the victims of the gang stalking crimes are in the same position as all other crime victims. Left sorting out the damage with no idea who is attacking them  or why.

Without any help from the authorities, with the outright denial by the authorities that gang stalking exists (they have been forced to admit that black listing exists. Sometimes they admit that police corruption exists. They admit that stalking exists. That grooming exists. That slander exists. Sometimes they can even be forced to admit that paedophilia exists. They acknowledge while dragging their feet that whistleblower reprisals exist. They admit that Scientologists “Fair Game” whose methods are identical with gang stalking exists. But no, according to the government gang stalking absolutely does not exist even though these methods were historically used by the Stasi and the KKK. And then  they have the gall to accuse gang stalking targets of suffering a delusion. But if you repeat a lie long enough …

So victims of gang stalking, Targeted Individuals are left guessing who is doing what to whom and why.

The Targets of gang stalking are the best clue. No, it is not upper class males of the ruling power elite. Yes it is the same  people in society who are constantly dumped on by their “superiors”.

The majority of Targets are working class women and ethnic groups. The second largest groups are gays. And the smallest group, which stands out because at first glance there seems to be no reason why they are targetted are the unique group dubbed “the upright men”.

That working class women, people of colour and gays are targetted seems no surprise. This just looks like classism, sexism/misogyny and homophobia have just gone underground, officially denied and publicly condemned but now continuing in secret with the same old persecution and denial of full citizen status.  That feminists are targetted also makes sense on a simple women-hating basis.

But as people who know about gang stalking have often noted, gang stalking employs a great deal of resources. How it is being financed has been one question not satisfactorily answered. This is one of the features that imply state involvement.

The targetting of lower class women and gays resonates with a sexual message. These particular targets suggest a sexual motive, and as the criminal sexual industry is very lucrative, this suggests a credible motive for gang stalking. The methods of slandering the woman especially the slander that she is a prostitute, then separating her from her family, friends and social support, denying her work or harassing her out of work, setting her up for sexual attack strongly suggest sexual grooming behaviour and the methods  sexual traffickers use to trap their victims. Gang stalking could be, among other things, coercive recruitment into prostitution. When you consider the insatiable market for porn and prostitutes obviously the major problem for the criminal industry is recruiting women where virtually no woman has any wish to be enslaved, and viciously sexually exploited to make somebody else rich. Coerced recruitment characterises the industry.

The Targeted Individual A K Forwood, proposed the theory that surveillance in the Targets homes was likely being sold over the internet to the insatiable porn market. This would tie in with the sex trafficker theory.

This theory – that gang stalkers are sex traffickers – then makes the choice  of targets perfectly clear. Poor women. Gay men. Feminists because many feminists work for charities which provide shelter for abused and homeless women. They are protecting the vulnerable targets.

And the last, mysterious group turns out not to be so mysterious after all.

The upright men – who protect women and of their nature cannot be blackmailed, coerced or bribed.

A lifetime of social exclusion, harassment, discrimination and stigmatisation

1950’s

– bad service from shopkeepers. Defective product and put to back of queue

– interest in art sabotaged

– achievements down played by teachers, faults magnified. Sabotage of possible achievements.

– persecution by teacher (year long), including inciting bullying by class

1960’s

-bad service from shopkeepers. As above

– bad service from hair dressers

– street sexual harassment, most days (going to school, going shopping. Completely standard activities)

– sexual molestation on public transport and cinema. Frequent, causing adaptive reaction.

– sexual molestation attending First Aid class

– social exclusion following leisure interests – conservation group, chess club

-withholding teaching by teachers, both at school and at night classes

– harassed out of work

– needed support taken away in workplace

1970’s

– sabotage and manipulation of relationships

– numerous attempts to sexually seduce

–  sexually harassed out of work

– left with no work to do in another job

– harassed by flat sharers

– friend burgled. Attempt made to frame another friend for the crime

– noise persecution by neighbour

– poisoned in a restaurant

– stalked by strangers

– slandered to relatives

– unwarranted police attention on fabricated grounds

– policeman gives me a pile of (unwanted) confiscated porn mags . Give them away when suspect landlord is coming into the flat to read them.

– policeman asks inappropriate questions about my sex life, and suggests “dressing up”

– slandered at university, causing social exclusion

– “nut-jobs” constantly shoved at me

– friendships lost through slander. Manipulation of friendships.

– manipulated into social contact with communists and Republican sympathisers

– people I baby-sit for start getting phone calls from an IRA family. They move away.

– attempt to manipulate seduction by higher social class man (contraception not easily available at this time)

– stalked by numerous strange men at accommodation causing one neighbour to sell up and the other to get a guard dog

– denied post-graduate application before taking finals. Grades up to then 2:1’s

– husband of a friend commits suicide

– prevented from obtaining employment. Police meddling apparently.

– have to move when landlord dies

– sexual harassment at accommodation

– obtained a job and police appear and talk to manager, who starts to ask strange questions

– friends burgled

– police stop parents when out driving, for no reason

– parent forced out of work

– then harassed in next job, which shortly after goes out of business

-parents see man with gun hanging around field at back of their house. Move house

– subjected to sexual assault while doing voluntary charity work. Risk of pregnancy, not on contraception.

1980’s

– at temp agency it is implied my qualifications are fraudulent

– potential employers NEVER require documentation of my qualifications

– job interviewer suggests a period of unemployment on my CV due to being in prison

– one employer who has evidently heard the slanders about me finds it hilarious

– then an ex? policeman is employed in the office, and he is a real creep. (Shows photos of naked people to the students for one example).

– people at work know details of my private life they have no way of knowing

– next job, office under-staffed and over-loaded with work

– next job, my purse is stolen by someone at work

–  harassment at accommodation. (By Muslims. In retrospect it seems likely they were reacting on the slanders spread about me)

– local shopkeepers told slanders about me

– on an educational course harassed (Again by Muslims, as above)

– relationship interfered with. Boyfriend swindled out of his life’ s savings.

– boyfriend has a riot outside his restaurant. Police don’t come until hours after the crowd has dispersed then treat him and his staff like criminals.

– boyfriend, very agitated, warns me to stay away from Muslims “they kidnap women”. (Boyfriend, Asian, Hindu).

– women at work carry on loud conversations about my supposed private life. Their information is incorrect, but stigmatising.

– at another job, female staff follow me to the loo.

– stalked by weirdos at next accommodation

– rapists are moved into the flat below. They rape a simple minded girl they lured.

– when they leave they are replaced by a wife batterer. When I move around my flat (I am light on my feet, don’t wear shoes indoors, carpeted floor) I am yelled at.

– stalked by strangers at next accommodation. They attempt to break in on two occasions.

– more verbal garbage from women at work (different job to above)

– everyone in the office freezes when I say “Hullo” to the high school student on work experience.

– Legal assistant, ex-policeman tells me they defended a man they knew was guilty and got him off, and he was a badun.

– female staff always follow me to the loo.

1990’s

[Move to live in London with my husband. A bed-sit house. Completely normal residents you neither see nor hear then -]

– strange chap moves in below. At night sharpens a knife on the gate post.

– goes on holiday and moves friends in who are prostitutes

– at work it seems slanders have been spread about me. One of the scum in the office is disappointed to find I am NOT a prostitute nor drug dealer.

– employer and other work colleagues treat the lies with derision.

– noise pest moves in who drives other residents out.

– psychiatric nurse moves in who brings his work home – a patient who cries and moans all night. When he gets fed-up with him, shoves him out into the hall.

– the psychiatric nurse spends the night clunking about his room, opening and shutting cupboard doors, and switching taps on and off.

– the noise pest has a sound sensitive girlfriend who complains my husband is slamming doors (not true)

– an IRA man moves in and everyone in the house moves out

– the noise pest buys a flat for £75k. A man with no visible means of support.

– the landlord’s wife leaves him and takes the house. A mixed race family. He is left with the children, now disinherited.

– the house is turned into luxury flats.

2000’s

– the place we move to has extreme noise pests upstairs. Can’t hear our television even on top volume.

– he and his missus take turns over filling their baths, the water running through the ceiling in our kitchen

– we have to move when a fire upstairs destroys the building

– the landlord offers us to claim on his contents insurance, but we lost nothing due to the firemen, so we decline

– another bed-sit house with normal tenants, working and retired people then –

– the quiet cafe below changes ownership and becomes an all night disco. The high volume noise immediately below starts every evening at 6pm, usually running to 2 am, but sometimes all night.

The tenant above comes down to tell us to turn the noise down then realises it is from the floor below.

I write to the Council as to whether the premises are licensed for selling alcohol and all night opening hours and receive a fob off reply.

– the flat above was empty. The previous tenant had died. The new tenants are extreme noise pests – clunking around, banging things down, slamming doors and cupboard doors. The tenant above them moves out due to the noise and offers us his flat. When we move the noisy restaurant changes ownership and becomes normal.

– the house next door sold up because of the noise – they had an autistic child – and next door was extended and converted into luxury flats.

– a new tenant moves in below. After a few months she moves out and another tenant moves in. A friend of this tenant takes over another flat. Out of those two flats the tenants keep changing. So they must be occupying other addresses.

– those tenants, African migrants, use multiple names, using every variation on spelling and sex possible. The address is also being used as a mail drop for about a dozen people who don’t live there.

– our mail is stolen

– on a doctor’s appointment the secretary tells me I am not registered with them. The Doctor appears, very flustered. I had been her patient for more than 10 years. She apologised. “Somehow” she said, ” my medical records had been sent to another part of London”.

– the new tenants leave the communal door open at all times. They keep breaking the security gate.

– going to work one morning, before 6am I noticed that the door to our previous flat was open. Our landlord used to repaint and recarpet before new tenancies, so I looked round the door to see what he had done with the place. But the room was occupied. There was an African girl standing there, but there were no possesions in the room. I apologised, saying I did not know the room was occupied.

– at a later date that girl was attacked. She came crying to the first African tenant who roughly told her to go away.

– that same tenant, the first one, stopped my husband and myself on the landing and told us she had just had a baby. We were astonished. She was a small woman who certainly hadn’t looked pregnant.

– later as I was entering the flats a middle aged, not very bright African woman was talking to the staff at the restaurant downstairs. She was telling them she had just had a baby, but she didn’t have it anymore.

– the baby came and went.

– there was a serious fire among the dustbins at the back. The house owner backing us was seriously upset.

– a fire was started in the flat next door. The house was evacuated. My husband was recovering from cancer and was still very weak, so he sat in the ambulance. The tenants of the flat where the fire started walked past us, clothed in what looked like a collection of shoelaces.

– the ground floor tenant was repeatedly flooded by over flowing baths from the floor above.

– the flats were upgraded. Eventually it was the rent which priced us out of London. We had the smallest studio costing us over £9k a year. The other  flats, twice the size of ours but still small were going for more than £1,000 a month, paid for by Housing Benefit.

2010’s

We moved to Yorkshire to find affordable accommodation. Within a year my husband’s cancer returned.

I suspected he was not getting correct medical treatment and medical staff were acting  in a way which I knew from previously working for Social Services, indicated suspicion of carer abuse. Diving through the door without knocking, arriving in pairs – But when I was subjected to bizarre behaviour from a relative  I enquired on Wikepedia reference desk, who told me the behaviour was gaslighting. In researching gaslighting I found “gang stalking” which indicated that all the above listed events were not coincidences, but orchestrated harassment. Some describe it as police harassment, tactics police use to frame people.

Far from being paranoid, it is obvious I was not paranoid enough. I just supposed the Northern Irish people were disgusting people with the manners of pig-ignorant peasants, and if you live in London you are choosing to live in a rubbish environment packed full of crooks, nutters and anti-social gits.

This isn’t everything that happened. It is hard to remember everything.

But there are things about the situation which don’t add up. The gang stalking protocol, with supposed police involvement, which appears to me to be the case, does not seem a reasonable activity if its sole purpose is just to harass the target. What legal justification is there for the police to harass law abiding citizens? It does not explain landlords being afflicted with anti-social tenants who systematically vandalise the property with flooding and arson. It does not explain people being harassed into selling their houses which are then modernised and re-let at luxury rents. It does not explain landlords losing their houses, and businesses closing down or changing ownership. It does not explain businesses previously providing excellent service at reasonable prices suddenly upping their prices and providing bad service – to everyone. Gang stalking if it is being carried out by police and/or security services,  appears a thin veneer for activities which more closely resemble mafia-type organised crime.

And it appears that as a target I have been used as bait, a foot in the door, the excuse for con artists to make contact with their real objectives – landlords, businesses, employers, legal,  professional, banking and medical staff.

How many businesses closing, how many landlords losing their houses then turned into luxury accomodation does it take before you can say without being accused of being “paranoid” that yes, this absolutely matches the description of gang stalking, and it also matches events you would expect to see with organised white-collar crime.

 

 

 

 

Gang stalking controllers = hate filled xenophobes. The Fourth Reich?

Like the great man said, “By their deeds ye shall know them”.

And who do gang stalkers hate? You have only to look at their targets. The first apparent targets – women, predominantly working class and ethnic women. Homosexuals. Ethnic groups. These people are the target bait for trapping the main targets, small business people, landlords, businesses of all sizes and professionals such as lawyers and medical staff.

So when you consider ALL the targets, it appears to be everybody who is not a member of the ruling elite – which leaves only one group who can be responsible for gang stalking.

Their agenda then is patently obvious. The process of gang stalking results in obtaining power over people and resources, which coincidentally, are the same over-riding objectives of the ruling class. Taking all power and wealth in society to themselves.

Along with their power and wealth grab their attitude to the people they exploit is reflected in their methods. These are the prime xenophobes in society. the greatest repository of irrational hatred directed at women, homosexuals, working class, ethnic groups, middle class, business class. So gang stalkers are not only misogynist, homophobes, racist and classist, they possess a bigotry unique to themselves – elitist.

Gang stalkers possess a feudal overlord mind-set. In more recent history the Nazi superman mind set. Anyone who is not part of their elite super-class are viewed as legitimate prey. Sub-humans.

Think of the Nazis. Only 3 classes in the world. Themselves, the over-lords. The people they tolerate as slaves. And the remainder – dead – after being robbed, experimented on and worked to death.

The absence of any ethics in gang stalking is a clear indicator. Gang stalkers not only mock people, they mock every value that sustains human life. Trust, honour, decency, honesty, innocence, affiliation, professional integrity, protection, support, parental values.

Many gang stalking target-baits have commented on the gang stalkers exploitation of children. How parents using their own children in a gang stalking spoof will be putting those children at risk of harm. Don’t they realise what this means? A parent who puts their child in harms way in an outrageous sketch can only be doing so because they fear worse harm is guaranteed to the child if they don’t.

Looks to me that the Fourth Reich is on the way.

All those history books are suddenly very relevant.

The gang stalking conspiracy of silence

HOW ARE GANG STALKERS FOLLOWING ME?

This question appeared on my search engine. It is a fundamental question. The only possible answers suggest state involvement.

Consider these situations. More than forty years ago I listened to conversations among Women’s Aid helpers baffled about how some of their women who had moved across country and severed all former ties to family and friends were still located by stalking ex-husbands or boyfriends who magically turned up outside the shelter, which itself had a concealed address.

Also many women stalked by ex-partners find their stalking by an individual morphs into organised vigilante stalking in their community.

Targets of organised vigilante stalking find moving makes no difference. Even if they move to a different country they are still stalked.

Trade Unionists put on blacklists, (UK) compiled many of them believe with the assistance of police and security services, found they could not get work anywhere in the country, wherever they went. This can only be done with access to confidential records and the existence of a data base, where action against the Target is triggered when their identifying details are located.  In the case of Trade Unionists their blacklisting was triggered when their employer checked their name and National Insurance number with a register of blacklisted workers.  The company that maintained the register, and who were unconcerned whether or not the details on it were correct, collected fees for their information.  That company also included names of environmentalists.

The business which was carried on in secret, meets anyone’s definition of a “conspiracy”.  A conspiracy of employers. Some of the blacklisted Trade Unionists believed the blacklisting business was carried out with the cooperation of the police and security services. The Trade Unionists were not blacklisted on reasonable grounds such as being incompetent or trouble makers. They were usually good workers who took on the role of Trade Union Health and Safety representatives to address dangerous work situations. The construction industry is inherently dangerous with an annual catalogue of fatalities, maimings and long-term health risks (such as exposure to asbestos). It seems strange that a government which has extended Health and Safety legislation in every walk of life is indifferent to real Health and Safety issues in a dangerous industry.

What is going on here?  It is illegal to discriminate  in employment against people on the basis of colour, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation, and as far as I know employers are not allowed to bar ex-criminals (excepting offences of sex or violence from some occupations), yet there is no law which prohibits discrimination against ordinary, law-abiding members of the public, who have been arbitrarily slandered by “somebody”? Such a shame libel and slander are not criminal offences when they can be used to prevent individuals from obtaining employment.

Organised community vigilante stalking must be being carried out in a like manner to blacklisting. That there exists a secret register of targets which is triggered whenever a name appears on official documentation of some kind. Who has access to confidential records in any bureaucracy?

The scale of organised vigilante stalking is such that the only possible candidates for carrying it out are the police, the security services, clandestine companies operating “lists” or organised crime, and any combination of these is also possible.

WHY GANG STALKING?

There are two possible objectives for the targeting. Most targets are women. The second largest category is homosexual men. The result of being denied employment or harassed out of employment is usually financial destitution, which is a major cause in forcing women  into prostitution with or without her consent.  The gang stalkers spread the lie that the woman is a prostitute to help the process along. Some Targets of gang stalking have suggested that surveillance footage of Targets in their own home  is used as pornographic material, made without the consent or knowledge of the Targets, and used to support the lie that the target is a prostitute as well as for financial gain.  And prostitution is a major world-wide criminal racket which supplies an insatiable market raking  in billions – but not for the women.

The other objective appears to be recruiting dupes into the gang stalking cult, where their lives will be controlled and the institutions they work for infiltrated and ultimately controlled by the stalkers. I arrived at the conclusion that Targets are bait when I noticed the large number of people associated with me over a lifetime had suffered huge financial losses, in the case of landlords, lost their houses and in the case of businesses changing their character completely from being well-run businesses offering a good, reliable and reasonably priced service to unreliable, shoddy and expensive. Once the gang stalkers have got their foot in the door they ease out the reliable staff replacing them with their own people. They appear to favour migrants who are more exploitable, accepting harsh working conditions for low pay and are  more accepting of corruption as normal compared with their countries of origin.   The financial bleeding of the individual and business targets is usually carried out very slowly over years. Timing of the final sting is carefully calculated to conceal the process. A lot of attention is paid to disrupting communication between people who might otherwise figure out what is happening.  The end result the landlord loses his houses and the business, after being run into the ground, changes ownership.

Gang stalking  resembles a mafia-run racket more than anything else, exploiting access to confidential records to identify targets to fleece and the means to do it.

Gang stalkers corrupt everything they touch.

Everyone with exploitable resources is the gang stalkers’ potential target.

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

Whether “authorities” are involved, authorities steadfastly deny gang stalking is occurring. This does not make sense that anyone can categorically claim that a wide-ranging collection of criminal and anti-social behaviours which everyone knows occurs, are not happening, when they are all happening together. Wholesale, unified denial across all authorities, all institutions could not happen without overall control.

It is open to conjecture whether or not “gang stalking” is happening. What is not open to conjecture is the conspiracy of silence.

 

 

 

 

The Gang Stalking Process

1.          Prevent the Target from getting work.

Failing that sabotage the Targets work and try to get them fired .  The method used here is gaslighting. Vandalising employers property that the Target is responsible for .  Harassing another worker, but make it look as if the Target is responsible.   Attempt to have the Targets pay reduced. Sabotage the Targets work.  By spreading lies manipulate other workers to sexually harass, gang up on, abuse or bully the Target (harassment by proxy).

(All the above were done to me at work. These techniques would have worked but for responsible management and work colleagues who rejected being manipulated. I WAS LUCKY.)

2 .           Prevent the Target from getting accommodation.

By spreading lies that the Target is a criminal.  If the Target gets accommodation harass them out with extreme, ongoing noise harassment; putting dangerous, criminal, anti-social neighbours in neighbouring flats; flooding them out; burning them out; pricing them out.

3.              Financial attacks.

Cause the Target to lose money by vandalising their property. If the Target rents, vandalise the landlords property that the Target rents, so that they will lose their bond. Devise ways to cheat the Target out of their money.

Devise ways to prevent the Target receiving their just entitlements – such as Welfare payments or pensions.

Devise ways to steal the Targets assets. Identity Theft can achieve both these objectives. Objective – to reduce Target to destitution.

4.              Criminalise the Target

Encourage the Target to commit a crime, such as making a false insurance claim. If the Target rejects criminal actions despite all encouragement, set them up for a crime they did not commit. Arrange for a crime to be committed and then fabricate evidence to make it look as if the Target is responsible.

5.               Spread the slander that the Target is insane.

Because of the gang stalking activity, odd things are occurring in the Targets vicinity all the time, as the Target is being subjected to gaslighting. The slander that  Target is insane provides a plausible explanation for the weirdness and attaches the blame for the occurrences to the Target .  If a situation is then manipulated to have the Target institutionalised in a mental institution (Patrick McLaw?) people have already been conditioned to think this is a normal event – they were lied to in advance that the Target was insane. This also means that nothing the Target says will be believed.

These cumulative, indirect attacks on the Target can prevent the person from getting work; get them sacked; make them homeless; deny them social support to which they are entitled; steal their assets; cause them to be raped/attacked; cause them to be falsely imprisoned/incarcerated in a mental institution.

Gang stalking Targets have suggested that the tactics used against them might be a form of social experiment – practice. Presumably to be applied on a large scale after the methods have been perfected.

Compare this gang stalking formula to the following article:-image

http://www.alternet.org/economy/6-step-process-dispose-poor-half-america

.

When gang stalkers take over –

WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A HOUSE

.    Criminals, criminal looking/acting types will move in.   There will be a lot of noise.

.    Neighbours will sell up and move. There will be a lot of building work as the newly changed ownership houses will be extended and renovated.  Bed sits will be upgraded into expensive flats.  Houses changed from bed-sit accommodation into expensive Guest Houses.

.      The original house will change ownership and be upgraded.

Poor people, ordinary working people and retired people will no longer live in the area, having been priced out.

………………………….

WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A HOTEL

.    The previously high quality, reasonably priced service will gradually deteriorate.

.     Long-term staff will leave. Jobs will be cut. New cheaper staff, often immigrants will be brought in as they can be made to work harder, longer, in worse conditions for lower wages.

.     Previously high standards for food will deteriorate. Customers will complain about the quality and preparation. Broken facilities will be left broken. The place will become dirty.

.     The highest tariff possible will be charged.

Local people who previously worked there will be forced to move away to look for work. Another good value hotel providing a good service to ordinary working and retired people, lost.

WHEN GANG STALKERS TAKE OVER A BUREAUCRACY

.    The business will become corrupted.  An honest, reliable good service can no longer be relied on.  Where the service deals with confidential records, confidentiality will be compromised.  Essential documentation will be “lost” or  information altered.  Communication will be delayed, hampered or break down completely. The customer can no longer depend on the service and complaints will be ignored and fobbed off.  Often the customer will be made out to be the problem.

 

WHEN GANG. STALKERS TAKE OVER A RETAIL OUTLET

.   If possible, the shop will be extended and upgraded.

.    Jobs will be cut, and opening hours increased. Long term local employees will often be laid off to be replaced by cheaper, more easily exploited migrants.

Workers will work longer hours, have more duties, will lose any “perks”.

.     Cheap ranges of goods will be abandoned completely or greatly reduced. The shop will stock more high profit items. There will be little good value for the customer.

The end result will be jobs for local workers will be lost and those that remain will find their work conditions greatly deteriorated.   The shop will price out many poor and lower income customers such as pensioners.

CONCLUSION

The infiltration of accommodation and businesses start when someone posing as or actually being a member of the police or security services, invites the cooperation of the landlord/business owner to cooperate with the surveillance and harassment of an ordinary member of the public whom he slanders with lies that that person is a dangerous criminal/terrorist/drug dealer/prostitute/paedophile.

The recruited person is then completely under the “authority’s” control and cannot tell anyone what is happening because it is “national security”.

Having observed the above consequences of gang stalking infiltration, and being the person lied about, I cannot see what the connection between the above consequences has got with “national security”.

.