Why do gang stalkers target the “upright men?”

If only criminals admitted their crimes. If only gang stalkers would put their hands up and say who they are and why they are doing it. But the victims of the gang stalking crimes are in the same position as all other crime victims. Left sorting out the damage with no idea who is attacking them  or why.

Without any help from the authorities, with the outright denial by the authorities that gang stalking exists (they have been forced to admit that black listing exists. Sometimes they admit that police corruption exists. They admit that stalking exists. That grooming exists. That slander exists. Sometimes they can even be forced to admit that paedophilia exists. They acknowledge while dragging their feet that whistleblower reprisals exist. They admit that Scientologists “Fair Game” whose methods are identical with gang stalking exists. But no, according to the government gang stalking absolutely does not exist even though these methods were historically used by the Stasi and the KKK. And then  they have the gall to accuse gang stalking targets of suffering a delusion. But if you repeat a lie long enough …

So victims of gang stalking, Targeted Individuals are left guessing who is doing what to whom and why.

The Targets of gang stalking are the best clue. No, it is not upper class males of the ruling power elite. Yes it is the same  people in society who are constantly dumped on by their “superiors”.

The majority of Targets are working class women and ethnic groups. The second largest groups are gays. And the smallest group, which stands out because at first glance there seems to be no reason why they are targetted are the unique group dubbed “the upright men”.

That working class women, people of colour and gays are targetted seems no surprise. This just looks like classism, sexism/misogyny and homophobia have just gone underground, officially denied and publicly condemned but now continuing in secret with the same old persecution and denial of full citizen status.  That feminists are targetted also makes sense on a simple women-hating basis.

But as people who know about gang stalking have often noted, gang stalking employs a great deal of resources. How it is being financed has been one question not satisfactorily answered. This is one of the features that imply state involvement.

The targetting of lower class women and gays resonates with a sexual message. These particular targets suggest a sexual motive, and as the criminal sexual industry is very lucrative, this suggests a credible motive for gang stalking. The methods of slandering the woman especially the slander that she is a prostitute, then separating her from her family, friends and social support, denying her work or harassing her out of work, setting her up for sexual attack strongly suggest sexual grooming behaviour and the methods  sexual traffickers use to trap their victims. Gang stalking could be, among other things, coercive recruitment into prostitution. When you consider the insatiable market for porn and prostitutes obviously the major problem for the criminal industry is recruiting women where virtually no woman has any wish to be enslaved, and viciously sexually exploited to make somebody else rich. Coerced recruitment characterises the industry.

The Targeted Individual A K Forwood, proposed the theory that surveillance in the Targets homes was likely being sold over the internet to the insatiable porn market. This would tie in with the sex trafficker theory.

This theory – that gang stalkers are sex traffickers – then makes the choice  of targets perfectly clear. Poor women. Gay men. Feminists because many feminists work for charities which provide shelter for abused and homeless women. They are protecting the vulnerable targets.

And the last, mysterious group turns out not to be so mysterious after all.

The upright men – who protect women and of their nature cannot be blackmailed, coerced or bribed.

Advertisements

Change of title, change of theme

Hey ho, another day, another hassle.

Just brought up my “Gang Stalking Mysteries” blog to discover my header had been altered from the poster “I am also a Russian Spy” to the default theme in abstract garish orange and reds.

I belong to that generation who are not computer savvy. It was months before I figured out how to customise the header, and I thought the result was rather cool and reflected the concept of the blog perfectly.

So I call up the customise tool and try to bring my “I am also a Russian Spy” header back. No go. The set up says my header has been changed, but then doesn’t do it.

So in order to get rid of the garish reds I decide to alter the theme, to something more suitable with fewer options for interference? meddling? sabotage?

I settle on a new theme which looks good, but then find the title is bizarrely presented – Gang stalking myster-    and on the next line  -ies.

Well, that will wow the audience.

After bumbling around trying to find how to prevent illogical word splitting I gave up and decided to shorten the title to “G??G Stalking”. So far WordPress or whatever, have not hyphenated it.

I can console myself  with the thought that “gang stalking” does not exist but so far government writers of our dictionaries  who tell you that words mean something completely different from what they actually do and other concepts that there are words for, don’t exist, have so far not attempted to tell the public that stalking does not exist. Although they are still trying to tell the public despite the evidence accepted by everyone else in the country that “blacklisting” does not exist.

The government still allows the public to acknowledge the existence of bullying in schools (although authorities have the habit of denying it is happening in any particular instance); bullying at work (ditto for bullying in schools with the added oftentimes that the victim is imagining it); harassment by neighbours (keep telling us about it and we’ll keep ignoring it until we get fed up and accuse YOU of being the problem); slander (only for rich people who can afford to sue); sex perverts next door (well they have to live somewhere, why not beside you); corrupt police (we’re working on it); framing (what corrupt police do); gagging (when you are victimised by the authorities you’re not allowed to talk about it, and neither are the press); censorship (same as gagging);  Identity Theft (major growing crime largely ignored by the media. It’s your problem to sort out); psychiatric hospital (not for the mentally ill. Reserved for people who disagree with the government’s version of reality); whistleblowers (don’t need them really); vigilantes (one rule for us, different rule for them); KKK (all gone now, never happened); Nazis (ancient history); Mafia (they live in Sicily, don’t they?); organised and white collar crime ( yeah, yeah but what the public really want to hear about is the spotty adolescent who threw a stone at somebody’s cat); political corruption (we have an excuse); brain washing (no, we absolutely don’t do it, No! No! No! – we’re just sending psych people into Job Centres to help the poor deluded fools who can’t find jobs – they are looking in the wrong place. Try India).

Hell’s bells, I could fill several pages of government twaddle as they assert this and deny that, and tell us they are working on the problem. It will be fixed some time next century, probably towards the end.

A friend once remarked that I was “abnormally” sane. It comes from following the advice a wise old man who really understood Ireland and Irish politics gave me. “If you start trying to understand how mad people think, by the time you understand you will be as mad as they are”.

Mad people can do your head in all at once in a crash course or by slow, gently sliding degrees – the slowly boiling frog. Either way, if you follow them, you end up nuts.

It bothers me when the government is sending psychiatrists to deal with the public in Job Centres at public expense having decided to only remember AUSTERITY when it suits them, when it looks like it is the government who need psychiatric help.

Transactional analysis from the insane – I’m OK, you’re all mad.

Or as an Irishwoman remarked proudly when watching her son marching out-of-step at a parade “They’re all out of step but my Johnnie”.

So, Gang Stalking Mysteries becomes G??G Stalking.

Who knows. Perhaps there are victims of stalking out there who didn’t realise they were being gang stalked.

Perhaps there are victims of blacklisting, slander, neighbour harassment, bureaucratic disservice, dishonest businesses, mobbing, vandals, anti-social pests, bullying, discrimination, prejudice, and general abuse everywhere they go, who do not realise they are being gang stalked. In fact being treated to all the worst features of racism, sexism and homophobia which are not supposed to exist anymore and against which the authorities pretend to take a strong stand. (But don’t mention classism – that doesn’t count).

Perhaps the gang stalkers who outnumber the gang stalking targets by ratios of hundreds to one will wake up from their cult-induced insanity and realise that they have been conned by people in authority/posing as people in authority, and they are all stalkers.

That our Pied Piper governments are all leading us a merry dance over a cliff.

 

image

 

 

 

There’s no such thing as “gang stalking” the authorities say. Perhaps we are using the wrong word. How about “framing”.

Have the authorities heard of “framing”? That practice of corrupt police sometimes working in collusion with criminals to shelter the criminals crimes.

Consider the methods used against the target. Someone either having or pretending to have official credentials freely criminally defames the target who is innocent of any crime. Coincidentally the police are allowed to slander people. The slanders spread are that the person is a drug user or dealer, prostitute, paedophile, jail bird, mentally unbalanced, terrorist – any combination or all to shock the dupe about to be recruited into cooperating with activities directed at the target.

Example. How do you think shop staff would behave if someone official “tipped them off” that a particular person is a shop lifter? Naturally they would follow that person about. They would scrutinise what they bought and what they put in their shopping basket. It might even be suggested to them that they get in that shopper’s way constantly to “put the wind up them” to let them know they are being watched. Honest shop workers will gladly do this viewing it as part of doing their job and grateful for the tip – except they’ve been lied to. They are the ones being played.

I have never shoplifted nor stolen anything in my life. My parents were honest to the point of being ridiculous. My mother’s father had been a policeman for a time. My mother taught me to always avoid ambiguous situations. Never permit grey areas. Never do anything that an onlooker putting an unfavourable interpretation on it could make out you were doing something wrong. When in shops keep your bags closed and don’t open them. Carry any item you intend to buy away from your body, obviously visible. Stay in the middle of the aisles away from the produce. Don’t wear concealing clothes.  Her training has proved priceless now I have discovered I am a target of gang stalking. I never do anything at any time which would contribute even to an appearance of guilt. So those seeking to frame me have to do all the running.

So the government, authorities, whatever deny the existence of gang stalking. I apologise. I should not have called it gang stalking. I should have called it by its correct name – framing.

Now what advice does the government/authorities have for working class women, people of colour, gays who are being framed, blacklisted, mobbed at work, stalked by perverts, slandered, persecuted by noisy, anti-social, criminal neighbours, denied service, wrongly billed, harassed, and lied to by officialdom?

Don’t be shy, after all, gang stalking does not exist.

A lifetime of social exclusion, harassment, discrimination and stigmatisation

1950’s

– bad service from shopkeepers. Defective product and put to back of queue

– interest in art sabotaged

– achievements down played by teachers, faults magnified. Sabotage of possible achievements.

– persecution by teacher (year long), including inciting bullying by class

1960’s

-bad service from shopkeepers. As above

– bad service from hair dressers

– street sexual harassment, most days (going to school, going shopping. Completely standard activities)

– sexual molestation on public transport and cinema. Frequent, causing adaptive reaction.

– sexual molestation attending First Aid class

– social exclusion following leisure interests – conservation group, chess club

-withholding teaching by teachers, both at school and at night classes

– harassed out of work

– needed support taken away in workplace

1970’s

– sabotage and manipulation of relationships

– numerous attempts to sexually seduce

–  sexually harassed out of work

– left with no work to do in another job

– harassed by flat sharers

– friend burgled. Attempt made to frame another friend for the crime

– noise persecution by neighbour

– poisoned in a restaurant

– stalked by strangers

– slandered to relatives

– unwarranted police attention on fabricated grounds

– policeman gives me a pile of (unwanted) confiscated porn mags . Give them away when suspect landlord is coming into the flat to read them.

– policeman asks inappropriate questions about my sex life, and suggests “dressing up”

– slandered at university, causing social exclusion

– “nut-jobs” constantly shoved at me

– friendships lost through slander. Manipulation of friendships.

– manipulated into social contact with communists and Republican sympathisers

– people I baby-sit for start getting phone calls from an IRA family. They move away.

– attempt to manipulate seduction by higher social class man (contraception not easily available at this time)

– stalked by numerous strange men at accommodation causing one neighbour to sell up and the other to get a guard dog

– denied post-graduate application before taking finals. Grades up to then 2:1’s

– husband of a friend commits suicide

– prevented from obtaining employment. Police meddling apparently.

– have to move when landlord dies

– sexual harassment at accommodation

– obtained a job and police appear and talk to manager, who starts to ask strange questions

– friends burgled

– police stop parents when out driving, for no reason

– parent forced out of work

– then harassed in next job, which shortly after goes out of business

-parents see man with gun hanging around field at back of their house. Move house

– subjected to sexual assault while doing voluntary charity work. Risk of pregnancy, not on contraception.

1980’s

– at temp agency it is implied my qualifications are fraudulent

– potential employers NEVER require documentation of my qualifications

– job interviewer suggests a period of unemployment on my CV due to being in prison

– one employer who has evidently heard the slanders about me finds it hilarious

– then an ex? policeman is employed in the office, and he is a real creep. (Shows photos of naked people to the students for one example).

– people at work know details of my private life they have no way of knowing

– next job, office under-staffed and over-loaded with work

– next job, my purse is stolen by someone at work

–  harassment at accommodation. (By Muslims. In retrospect it seems likely they were reacting on the slanders spread about me)

– local shopkeepers told slanders about me

– on an educational course harassed (Again by Muslims, as above)

– relationship interfered with. Boyfriend swindled out of his life’ s savings.

– boyfriend has a riot outside his restaurant. Police don’t come until hours after the crowd has dispersed then treat him and his staff like criminals.

– boyfriend, very agitated, warns me to stay away from Muslims “they kidnap women”. (Boyfriend, Asian, Hindu).

– women at work carry on loud conversations about my supposed private life. Their information is incorrect, but stigmatising.

– at another job, female staff follow me to the loo.

– stalked by weirdos at next accommodation

– rapists are moved into the flat below. They rape a simple minded girl they lured.

– when they leave they are replaced by a wife batterer. When I move around my flat (I am light on my feet, don’t wear shoes indoors, carpeted floor) I am yelled at.

– stalked by strangers at next accommodation. They attempt to break in on two occasions.

– more verbal garbage from women at work (different job to above)

– everyone in the office freezes when I say “Hullo” to the high school student on work experience.

– Legal assistant, ex-policeman tells me they defended a man they knew was guilty and got him off, and he was a badun.

– female staff always follow me to the loo.

1990’s

[Move to live in London with my husband. A bed-sit house. Completely normal residents you neither see nor hear then -]

– strange chap moves in below. At night sharpens a knife on the gate post.

– goes on holiday and moves friends in who are prostitutes

– at work it seems slanders have been spread about me. One of the scum in the office is disappointed to find I am NOT a prostitute nor drug dealer.

– employer and other work colleagues treat the lies with derision.

– noise pest moves in who drives other residents out.

– psychiatric nurse moves in who brings his work home – a patient who cries and moans all night. When he gets fed-up with him, shoves him out into the hall.

– the psychiatric nurse spends the night clunking about his room, opening and shutting cupboard doors, and switching taps on and off.

– the noise pest has a sound sensitive girlfriend who complains my husband is slamming doors (not true)

– an IRA man moves in and everyone in the house moves out

– the noise pest buys a flat for £75k. A man with no visible means of support.

– the landlord’s wife leaves him and takes the house. A mixed race family. He is left with the children, now disinherited.

– the house is turned into luxury flats.

2000’s

– the place we move to has extreme noise pests upstairs. Can’t hear our television even on top volume.

– he and his missus take turns over filling their baths, the water running through the ceiling in our kitchen

– we have to move when a fire upstairs destroys the building

– the landlord offers us to claim on his contents insurance, but we lost nothing due to the firemen, so we decline

– another bed-sit house with normal tenants, working and retired people then –

– the quiet cafe below changes ownership and becomes an all night disco. The high volume noise immediately below starts every evening at 6pm, usually running to 2 am, but sometimes all night.

The tenant above comes down to tell us to turn the noise down then realises it is from the floor below.

I write to the Council as to whether the premises are licensed for selling alcohol and all night opening hours and receive a fob off reply.

– the flat above was empty. The previous tenant had died. The new tenants are extreme noise pests – clunking around, banging things down, slamming doors and cupboard doors. The tenant above them moves out due to the noise and offers us his flat. When we move the noisy restaurant changes ownership and becomes normal.

– the house next door sold up because of the noise – they had an autistic child – and next door was extended and converted into luxury flats.

– a new tenant moves in below. After a few months she moves out and another tenant moves in. A friend of this tenant takes over another flat. Out of those two flats the tenants keep changing. So they must be occupying other addresses.

– those tenants, African migrants, use multiple names, using every variation on spelling and sex possible. The address is also being used as a mail drop for about a dozen people who don’t live there.

– our mail is stolen

– on a doctor’s appointment the secretary tells me I am not registered with them. The Doctor appears, very flustered. I had been her patient for more than 10 years. She apologised. “Somehow” she said, ” my medical records had been sent to another part of London”.

– the new tenants leave the communal door open at all times. They keep breaking the security gate.

– going to work one morning, before 6am I noticed that the door to our previous flat was open. Our landlord used to repaint and recarpet before new tenancies, so I looked round the door to see what he had done with the place. But the room was occupied. There was an African girl standing there, but there were no possesions in the room. I apologised, saying I did not know the room was occupied.

– at a later date that girl was attacked. She came crying to the first African tenant who roughly told her to go away.

– that same tenant, the first one, stopped my husband and myself on the landing and told us she had just had a baby. We were astonished. She was a small woman who certainly hadn’t looked pregnant.

– later as I was entering the flats a middle aged, not very bright African woman was talking to the staff at the restaurant downstairs. She was telling them she had just had a baby, but she didn’t have it anymore.

– the baby came and went.

– there was a serious fire among the dustbins at the back. The house owner backing us was seriously upset.

– a fire was started in the flat next door. The house was evacuated. My husband was recovering from cancer and was still very weak, so he sat in the ambulance. The tenants of the flat where the fire started walked past us, clothed in what looked like a collection of shoelaces.

– the ground floor tenant was repeatedly flooded by over flowing baths from the floor above.

– the flats were upgraded. Eventually it was the rent which priced us out of London. We had the smallest studio costing us over £9k a year. The other  flats, twice the size of ours but still small were going for more than £1,000 a month, paid for by Housing Benefit.

2010’s

We moved to Yorkshire to find affordable accommodation. Within a year my husband’s cancer returned.

I suspected he was not getting correct medical treatment and medical staff were acting  in a way which I knew from previously working for Social Services, indicated suspicion of carer abuse. Diving through the door without knocking, arriving in pairs – But when I was subjected to bizarre behaviour from a relative  I enquired on Wikepedia reference desk, who told me the behaviour was gaslighting. In researching gaslighting I found “gang stalking” which indicated that all the above listed events were not coincidences, but orchestrated harassment. Some describe it as police harassment, tactics police use to frame people.

Far from being paranoid, it is obvious I was not paranoid enough. I just supposed the Northern Irish people were disgusting people with the manners of pig-ignorant peasants, and if you live in London you are choosing to live in a rubbish environment packed full of crooks, nutters and anti-social gits.

This isn’t everything that happened. It is hard to remember everything.

But there are things about the situation which don’t add up. The gang stalking protocol, with supposed police involvement, which appears to me to be the case, does not seem a reasonable activity if its sole purpose is just to harass the target. What legal justification is there for the police to harass law abiding citizens? It does not explain landlords being afflicted with anti-social tenants who systematically vandalise the property with flooding and arson. It does not explain people being harassed into selling their houses which are then modernised and re-let at luxury rents. It does not explain landlords losing their houses, and businesses closing down or changing ownership. It does not explain businesses previously providing excellent service at reasonable prices suddenly upping their prices and providing bad service – to everyone. Gang stalking if it is being carried out by police and/or security services,  appears a thin veneer for activities which more closely resemble mafia-type organised crime.

And it appears that as a target I have been used as bait, a foot in the door, the excuse for con artists to make contact with their real objectives – landlords, businesses, employers, legal,  professional, banking and medical staff.

How many businesses closing, how many landlords losing their houses then turned into luxury accomodation does it take before you can say without being accused of being “paranoid” that yes, this absolutely matches the description of gang stalking, and it also matches events you would expect to see with organised white-collar crime.

 

 

 

 

Witness protection – the latest ruse to silence a gang stalked complainer?

One set of lies to one set of people; another set of lies to another set of people; and a third set of lies to a third set of people.

That is the gang stalker/espionage method. And the priority is to keep all the separate parties separate. So they don’t compare stories and realise they have been conned.

Like my tee-shirts?

image

The problem for the gang stalking target, the gang stalker’s bait, is that while everyone is talking about you, no-one will listen. Why would anyone listen to what a criminal/crazy says, when a “person in authority” has told them that that person is a criminal/crazy.

Until I started wearing my tee-shirts with such slogans as; bait; targeted-individuals (army veterans;  vigilante stalking cults; beware white-collar fraudsters; etcetera, I would be followed in public, in cafes, in the library, on buses, by well-meaning idiots, mostly women clearly not in the Einstein bracket, carrying on  loud and inane conversations including details of my private life which no-one not really close to me would know. Such riveting secrets as I get up really early in the morning (working for the Royal Mail for twenty years does that to you), and place-name dropping about Australia (my late Mum was an aussie), and Tooting, (suburb in London where I used to live).  The dear ladies all engrossed in the adventure of their lives. Who would guess they were playing James Bond.

All this stopped when I started wearing my tee-shirts with the deliberately cognitive dissonance  producing messages.  Aren’t the authorities famously stringent against vigilantes? Do the dupes know what the military/espionage term “targeted individual” means? If not look up the British Army vets site – targeted-individuals – they will tell you. Are you familiar with how cults recruit – with lies. And the victim is the recruit who is reduced to slavery with the use of mind-bending/brain-washing techniques and is then fleeced. So check out “Fair Game” and notice the similarities. But even a good teacher can’t get through to thick pupils (sigh) and the gang stalker recruits are being conned by experts.

So when the dummies stopped following me, they were replaced by rather annoyed looking military/police types.

My latest favourite tee-shirt, “I am also a Russian spy” has set up a spate of “clue-dropping” all over internet sites I frequent. Allusions to “witness protection” and “You have the right to remain silent. Shut up”.

Umm. Witness protection. Haven’t heard of that gang stalker ruse before. Because, obviously, someone who was under witness protection would be acting completely irrationally, (with the implication they might need to be locked up “for their own protection”) by drawing attention to themselves.

Patrick McLaw anyone?

image

Middle class people are vulnerable to recruitment by gang stalkers because of their mind-set of using information as a social commodity

– as in the cliche “the in-set and the out-set”.

The “in-set” are “people like us”, that is middle-class. If you are working class you can never be “in”.  Not being “in” means being socially excluded. Not as blatant as “No blacks, no Irish”, where at least there is evidence that discrimination is taking place. The working class are just subtly kept out of the social dialogue where it matters. The working class person will the the one talked about, but not talked to. Monitored, but not listened to.  A similar situation is how men treat women. In a work situation where the parties are supposedly equal, working class and women will be kept in the dark. Those on the inside track gain power over those excluded. The insiders have the knowkedge which helps them perform efficiently, but the outsider will be left in ignorance, or even jokingly misinformed – confirming their lower status and maintaining it through control of information.  What you know, what you don’t know, and what people believe rather than what is true. The middle classes are the people always whispering behind their hands.

Of course the people on the inside enjoy their feeling of power over their “inferiors” and the advantages they gain with their special knowledge. If the working class person or woman try to break through these invisible and denied social barriers, many tricks will be used to make them look like fools, or trouble-makers or un-hinged. These methods of maintaining middle class social power is part of the definition and identity of being middle-class. Working class people, especially women, are bewildered by it. They know something is going on, but they don’t understand why. People understand and can identify racism and sexism because it is blatant. But classism is subtle. The middle class are psychologically and socially, conspirators. It is their secret which they never admit. It is how they arrange to keep middle class jobs and promotions among themselves.

This mind-set is a gift to the gang stalking recruiters. They use the individual’s psychology, social norms and prejudices against their target – not the original target bait – but the people recruited using the bait.

When a middle class person is approached by another middle class person but of seeming higher rank, someone who is going to put them on the inside track by imparting secretive information which they must not reveal, they fall over themselves to co-operate. Especially when the person slandered is working class this happily confirms that a working class person couldn’t be intelligent, well-qualified, and a decent person. The stereotype that the human race stops at the boundaries of the middle class and everyone beyond is stupid, immoral and probably criminal is comfortingly confirmed. Someone in authority said so, so it must be true.

When lies were told about me to employers/prospective employers, the middle class people fell for it every time. When I worked at a university and for different solicitors  my employers and work colleagues accepted without question what they were told. Only at the Royal Mail where I worked for twenty years were the slanders met with scepticism.  Managers carried out their own checks and concluded the rumours were groundless, and work colleagues viewed the lies with derision.

Targeted Individuals are the canaries in the mine

Believe or disbelieve targets of gang stalking – and yes, I know, 90 percent of gang stalking sites are hyped up balderdash, which is interesting as no other “conspiracy theory” has an equivalent volume of discrediting material attached to it – believe or disbelieve, but listen.

Victims of gaslighting are discredited the moment they open their mouths as a result of the way the situation is framed around them. And Targeted Individuals are victims of a major gaslighting strategy. Look what you are up against when you try to tell anyone the truth about what is happening. Unknown to you, often for years, you have been the target of a slander campaign. Isn’t slander against the law? Yes. But not for the police. So who is going to believe anything a criminal/prostitute/drug dealer or user/sexual pervert/paedophile/mentally deranged person says. After that when the stalkers engage in their weird behaviour and you recount it, your account simply seems to be confirming evidence that you are a nut.

So we are all the targets of con artists. The targets, the dupes recruited to act against them and the wider audience who still believe in the just world fallacy and serious political corruption and conspiracies only occurred in other places and other times, like Nazi Germany, soviet Russia or Korea. But not here. Not now. Not in the democratic, respecting rule of law, freedom-loving West.

The common reponse of anyone listening to a Targeted Individual relating what is happening to them is to ask “But why go to all that trouble over you? You are unimportant”. Some Targets theorised that they were being targeted for security services to practice their skills. Others that they were being used as experimental subjects. That the majority of targets are women and gay men would suggest a motivation for sexual exploitation. Security services are notorious for their sexual obsession and using sex as a trap to blackmail people they wish to control. The easiest place to recruit honey pots with an invisible social identity is from the working class and lower middle class – especially those with the intelligence and personality needed to rise socially.

But here I want to consider the suggestion that gang stalking targets are being used as practice for methods of social control.

Methods of social control include

social exclusion,

creating a pariah status,

stigmatisation,

slander

lies

obstruction in obtaining the means of livelihood, such as black listing or sabotage in the workplace,

denial of service (the classical “No Blacks”),

bad service,

denuding Target’s financial resources through theft,

fraud,

identity theft,

vandalism,

sabotage,

con artist tricks,

altering Will’s,

refusal to pay legitimate insurance claims,

refusing to insure,

falsified records,

lost records,

theft of essential documents,

refusal of entitled welfare benefits,

theft of pension,

interference with mail,

phone

and e-mail communications.

As a Target of gang stalkers I have experienced most of the above list. (And note. Most of the above are white-collar crimes).

You can add to this, and there may be an experimental side to it, denial of needed medical services. Failure to diagnose can lead to the death of the person thereby denied the needed medical intervention. And allow other conditions to worsen. In addition stress can kill and hasten the deaths of elderly and seriously ill people.

………

In the last three months of my husband’s life I believe the medical staff dealing with him ignored obvious and extreme symptoms which resulted in him not receiving the appropriate medical treatment. It is unlikely that in his case that caused his death, as he had terminal cancer with tumours at multiple sites including in the brain and the bones, but it certainly contributed to unnecessary additional suffering. (I believe they withheld treatment for one flooded lung and heart failure as lack of oxygen to the brain creates very unstable behaviour, as in a person who is extremely intoxicated. As I believe the slander was being spread that I was an abusive carer, perhaps they hoped I would not be able to cope with his bouts of extreme, irrational behaviour, thankfully infrequent. He was a very strong man and normally very self-disciplined. They withheld oxygen to promote irrational behaviour hoping to create “evidence” supporting their lies. In the last weeks of my husband’s life he must have felt as if he was slowly suffocating. Insufficient oxygen also causes exhaustion. I only found out about gang stalking AFTER my husband’s death. And then the suspicions I had had at the time about his medical treatment led me to research in detail his symptoms, the consequences and the appropriate treatments. I have no medical background. I only put the picture together months after his death.

………..

The most obvious problem is interference with communications.

Letters for my husband’s hospital appointments arrived the day after the appointment. This happened even when the letters were sent out in good time. Even the Royal Mail should be able to deliver a local letter in a rural town  and a distance of about two miles – in four days.

In general, over the years letters did not arrive or were very delayed. Unimportant letters were never interfered with, only essential communications, which caused problems.

Sending or receiving letters by Recorded Delivery or Special Delivery made no difference. I have had documents lost in the post using both these methods. I no longer allow original documents out of my hands.

Using the phone is generally a great waste of time and money. You are put on hold for ever, often on premium rates, and then fobbed off. The person who can deal with the problem is on holiday. It’s not this department, Hold while I put you through. Or you are passed from department to department in a circle arriving at your starting point. It’s a great game for someone. I gave up using the phone years ago.

Avoiding the phone, letters not arriving, I turned to the internet. Same pattern. My e-mail provider tells me that a correct e-mail address (as written on the bottom of a letter I have just received) does not exist. Or the message fails to send. Or the message is scrambled. Or the message is apparently sent normally but I never receive a reply. It must seem to a lot of agencies that I am deliberately incommunicado. But short of arriving in person on everyone’s doorstep, modern methods of communication appear to have been made off-limits to me. Denial of service and causing huge disruption.

A wedge is driven between you and the larger community. It becomes a monumental struggle to obtain normal service from anyone. You have to cover your tracks. Keep records and not lose them or allow them to be stolen. I have had documents and personal papers stolen from my flat. Nothing else was touched.  As far as possible get written records, as people will lie to your face.

So what’s my bone? What has happened to me is now happening to a lot of people – not necessarily Targets of gang stalking. I see four classes of people affected. The elderly, the ill/handicapped, unemployed and working class. All these groups are finding they are stigmatised on no grounds, being deliberately categorised with the criminal class. They are set up for social abuse. They are denied their entitlements at the same time as being insulted, provoked, fobbed off, lied to and about, misled, and generally obstructed. Gang stalking targets have protested for years that the intention of the stalkers was to render them financially destitute and homeless. This is now happening on a large scale. The groups mentioned are finding increasingly that they cannot rely on any institution to render them an honest, professional, reliable service. Their complaints are ignored or the situation is twisted and they are accused of being the trouble-makers.

To be forewarned is to be forearmed.

You will find a clear account of gang stalkers methods at:-

image

image

The Section of interest is in purple “Summary – Gang-Stalking in 11 Min

You might find you are experiencing some of these methods. It does not necessarily mean you are a Target of gang stalkers. But that the methods which the stalkers have practiced against Targets have gone main-stream and are now tactics used by various institutions against selected sections of the populace. I draw attention to the article so you will be aware of  tactics that might be being used against you.