HOW ARE GANG STALKERS FOLLOWING ME?
This question appeared on my search engine. It is a fundamental question. The only possible answers suggest state involvement.
Consider these situations. More than forty years ago I listened to conversations among Women’s Aid helpers baffled about how some of their women who had moved across country and severed all former ties to family and friends were still located by stalking ex-husbands or boyfriends who magically turned up outside the shelter, which itself had a concealed address.
Also many women stalked by ex-partners find their stalking by an individual morphs into organised vigilante stalking in their community.
Targets of organised vigilante stalking find moving makes no difference. Even if they move to a different country they are still stalked.
Trade Unionists put on blacklists, (UK) compiled many of them believe with the assistance of police and security services, found they could not get work anywhere in the country, wherever they went. This can only be done with access to confidential records and the existence of a data base, where action against the Target is triggered when their identifying details are located. In the case of Trade Unionists their blacklisting was triggered when their employer checked their name and National Insurance number with a register of blacklisted workers. The company that maintained the register, and who were unconcerned whether or not the details on it were correct, collected fees for their information. That company also included names of environmentalists.
The business which was carried on in secret, meets anyone’s definition of a “conspiracy”. A conspiracy of employers. Some of the blacklisted Trade Unionists believed the blacklisting business was carried out with the cooperation of the police and security services. The Trade Unionists were not blacklisted on reasonable grounds such as being incompetent or trouble makers. They were usually good workers who took on the role of Trade Union Health and Safety representatives to address dangerous work situations. The construction industry is inherently dangerous with an annual catalogue of fatalities, maimings and long-term health risks (such as exposure to asbestos). It seems strange that a government which has extended Health and Safety legislation in every walk of life is indifferent to real Health and Safety issues in a dangerous industry.
What is going on here? It is illegal to discriminate in employment against people on the basis of colour, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation, and as far as I know employers are not allowed to bar ex-criminals (excepting offences of sex or violence from some occupations), yet there is no law which prohibits discrimination against ordinary, law-abiding members of the public, who have been arbitrarily slandered by “somebody”? Such a shame libel and slander are not criminal offences when they can be used to prevent individuals from obtaining employment.
Organised community vigilante stalking must be being carried out in a like manner to blacklisting. That there exists a secret register of targets which is triggered whenever a name appears on official documentation of some kind. Who has access to confidential records in any bureaucracy?
The scale of organised vigilante stalking is such that the only possible candidates for carrying it out are the police, the security services, clandestine companies operating “lists” or organised crime, and any combination of these is also possible.
WHY GANG STALKING?
There are two possible objectives for the targeting. Most targets are women. The second largest category is homosexual men. The result of being denied employment or harassed out of employment is usually financial destitution, which is a major cause in forcing women into prostitution with or without her consent. The gang stalkers spread the lie that the woman is a prostitute to help the process along. Some Targets of gang stalking have suggested that surveillance footage of Targets in their own home is used as pornographic material, made without the consent or knowledge of the Targets, and used to support the lie that the target is a prostitute as well as for financial gain. And prostitution is a major world-wide criminal racket which supplies an insatiable market raking in billions – but not for the women.
The other objective appears to be recruiting dupes into the gang stalking cult, where their lives will be controlled and the institutions they work for infiltrated and ultimately controlled by the stalkers. I arrived at the conclusion that Targets are bait when I noticed the large number of people associated with me over a lifetime had suffered huge financial losses, in the case of landlords, lost their houses and in the case of businesses changing their character completely from being well-run businesses offering a good, reliable and reasonably priced service to unreliable, shoddy and expensive. Once the gang stalkers have got their foot in the door they ease out the reliable staff replacing them with their own people. They appear to favour migrants who are more exploitable, accepting harsh working conditions for low pay and are more accepting of corruption as normal compared with their countries of origin. The financial bleeding of the individual and business targets is usually carried out very slowly over years. Timing of the final sting is carefully calculated to conceal the process. A lot of attention is paid to disrupting communication between people who might otherwise figure out what is happening. The end result the landlord loses his houses and the business, after being run into the ground, changes ownership.
Gang stalking resembles a mafia-run racket more than anything else, exploiting access to confidential records to identify targets to fleece and the means to do it.
Gang stalkers corrupt everything they touch.
Everyone with exploitable resources is the gang stalkers’ potential target.
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
Whether “authorities” are involved, authorities steadfastly deny gang stalking is occurring. This does not make sense that anyone can categorically claim that a wide-ranging collection of criminal and anti-social behaviours which everyone knows occurs, are not happening, when they are all happening together. Wholesale, unified denial across all authorities, all institutions could not happen without overall control.
It is open to conjecture whether or not “gang stalking” is happening. What is not open to conjecture is the conspiracy of silence.