The gang stalking conspiracy of silence


This question appeared on my search engine. It is a fundamental question. The only possible answers suggest state involvement.

Consider these situations. More than forty years ago I listened to conversations among Women’s Aid helpers baffled about how some of their women who had moved across country and severed all former ties to family and friends were still located by stalking ex-husbands or boyfriends who magically turned up outside the shelter, which itself had a concealed address.

Also many women stalked by ex-partners find their stalking by an individual morphs into organised vigilante stalking in their community.

Targets of organised vigilante stalking find moving makes no difference. Even if they move to a different country they are still stalked.

Trade Unionists put on blacklists, (UK) compiled many of them believe with the assistance of police and security services, found they could not get work anywhere in the country, wherever they went. This can only be done with access to confidential records and the existence of a data base, where action against the Target is triggered when their identifying details are located.  In the case of Trade Unionists their blacklisting was triggered when their employer checked their name and National Insurance number with a register of blacklisted workers.  The company that maintained the register, and who were unconcerned whether or not the details on it were correct, collected fees for their information.  That company also included names of environmentalists.

The business which was carried on in secret, meets anyone’s definition of a “conspiracy”.  A conspiracy of employers. Some of the blacklisted Trade Unionists believed the blacklisting business was carried out with the cooperation of the police and security services. The Trade Unionists were not blacklisted on reasonable grounds such as being incompetent or trouble makers. They were usually good workers who took on the role of Trade Union Health and Safety representatives to address dangerous work situations. The construction industry is inherently dangerous with an annual catalogue of fatalities, maimings and long-term health risks (such as exposure to asbestos). It seems strange that a government which has extended Health and Safety legislation in every walk of life is indifferent to real Health and Safety issues in a dangerous industry.

What is going on here?  It is illegal to discriminate  in employment against people on the basis of colour, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation, and as far as I know employers are not allowed to bar ex-criminals (excepting offences of sex or violence from some occupations), yet there is no law which prohibits discrimination against ordinary, law-abiding members of the public, who have been arbitrarily slandered by “somebody”? Such a shame libel and slander are not criminal offences when they can be used to prevent individuals from obtaining employment.

Organised community vigilante stalking must be being carried out in a like manner to blacklisting. That there exists a secret register of targets which is triggered whenever a name appears on official documentation of some kind. Who has access to confidential records in any bureaucracy?

The scale of organised vigilante stalking is such that the only possible candidates for carrying it out are the police, the security services, clandestine companies operating “lists” or organised crime, and any combination of these is also possible.


There are two possible objectives for the targeting. Most targets are women. The second largest category is homosexual men. The result of being denied employment or harassed out of employment is usually financial destitution, which is a major cause in forcing women  into prostitution with or without her consent.  The gang stalkers spread the lie that the woman is a prostitute to help the process along. Some Targets of gang stalking have suggested that surveillance footage of Targets in their own home  is used as pornographic material, made without the consent or knowledge of the Targets, and used to support the lie that the target is a prostitute as well as for financial gain.  And prostitution is a major world-wide criminal racket which supplies an insatiable market raking  in billions – but not for the women.

The other objective appears to be recruiting dupes into the gang stalking cult, where their lives will be controlled and the institutions they work for infiltrated and ultimately controlled by the stalkers. I arrived at the conclusion that Targets are bait when I noticed the large number of people associated with me over a lifetime had suffered huge financial losses, in the case of landlords, lost their houses and in the case of businesses changing their character completely from being well-run businesses offering a good, reliable and reasonably priced service to unreliable, shoddy and expensive. Once the gang stalkers have got their foot in the door they ease out the reliable staff replacing them with their own people. They appear to favour migrants who are more exploitable, accepting harsh working conditions for low pay and are  more accepting of corruption as normal compared with their countries of origin.   The financial bleeding of the individual and business targets is usually carried out very slowly over years. Timing of the final sting is carefully calculated to conceal the process. A lot of attention is paid to disrupting communication between people who might otherwise figure out what is happening.  The end result the landlord loses his houses and the business, after being run into the ground, changes ownership.

Gang stalking  resembles a mafia-run racket more than anything else, exploiting access to confidential records to identify targets to fleece and the means to do it.

Gang stalkers corrupt everything they touch.

Everyone with exploitable resources is the gang stalkers’ potential target.


Whether “authorities” are involved, authorities steadfastly deny gang stalking is occurring. This does not make sense that anyone can categorically claim that a wide-ranging collection of criminal and anti-social behaviours which everyone knows occurs, are not happening, when they are all happening together. Wholesale, unified denial across all authorities, all institutions could not happen without overall control.

It is open to conjecture whether or not “gang stalking” is happening. What is not open to conjecture is the conspiracy of silence.






Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life

A Targeted Individual made the comment that being gang stalked was like having an abusive husband without having married one.

There is a curious coincidence between the tactics of abuse of coercive control and the gang stalking formula.

1.   The abuser chooses his target and infiltrates into his victim’ life.

2.     He isolates the victim and immediately sets to breaking all her social ties/poisons her social relationships. He causes the victim to be stigmatised by spreading  lies so as to discredit her.

3.      He is a financial parasite/ predator attacking the victims ability to earn an income and wasting her resources.

4.      He attacks/ undermines the victim’s personality by undermining her interests whether intellectual/artistic/musical etc, by preventing or obstructing her from participation or demanding she re-prioritises her life according to her manipulator’s agenda. He destroys her autonomy and micro-manages her life.

5.      He attempts to reduce the victim to a domestic/sexual slave, dictating her appearance and behaviour.

6.     The victim is at risk of sexual assault/rape/physical attack and murder by her persecutor.

These methods are also used by cults, brainwashers, pimps, traffickers and owners of slaves. A common purpose is sexual exploitation often accompanied by great financial rewards for the perpetrator.  The majority of targets are women.

As the methods of coercive control and the gang stalking formula are identical, perhaps it is significant that women cannot simply avoid abuse from men by avoiding relating to them. Single, independent women are a major category of gang stalking target .  The end result is like racism, applied by men to women in general, regardless of whether they are in a relationship or not.

Battered Mothers - A Human Rights Issue

Coercive ControlDespite its great achievements, the domestic violence revolution is stalled, Evan Stark argues, a provocative conclusion he documents by showing that interventions have failed to improve womens long-term safety in relationships or to hold perpetrators accountable.

Stark traces this failure to a startling paradox, that the singular focus on violence against women masks an even more devastating reality. In millions of abusive relationships, men use a largely unidentified form of subjugation that more closely resembles kidnapping or indentured servitude than assault. He calls this pattern coercive control. Drawing on sources that range from FBI statistics and film to dozens of actual cases from his thirty years of experience as an award-winning researcher, advocate, and forensic expert, Stark shows in terrifying detail how men can use coercive control to extend their dominance over time and through social space in ways that subvert womens autonomy, isolate them, and infiltrate…

View original post 451 more words

Gang stalkers trash relationships

The most unexpected gang stalking tactic, and the one which people are least prepared for, is the priority placed on trashing people’s relationships – both personal as with lovers or closest friends or family. But also social, deliberately disrupting any social group the Target is involved in – whether work, a social club, or group of friends.

This is an extremely invasive and unusual technique and to my knowledge only two classes of criminals have used this technique as standard. The first are pimps and traffickers who pre-select women they wish to drive into prostitution, and so set out to deliberately destroy the woman’s social support across the board so as to isolate her. The second group of criminals who made a point of attacking their Target by infiltrating their social group and sabotaging their social links, were the secret political police of Soviet Russia, the German Stasi and COINTELPRO.

First pimps and people traffickers. The methods used to force women into prostitution are standard and historical and follow the same formula. The Target women are poor or working class women, and so lack social protection. Unfortunately, no matter how carefully a woman lives so as to protect her good reputation on which a good marriage and/or a good job relies, that can be simply negated by a man lying about her, telling everyone she is a prostitute. Men are happy to believe this as the demand for prostitutes might as well be infinite. Women of higher social class are happy to believe it, because it boosts their own moral stature with no effort on their part and takes a lower class woman out of the competition for good jobs and good men. The pimps will also work to alienate the woman’s family so that she will lose their support. And of course, if she is in a relationship or seems about to have a stable relationship, the slander will put that relationship in the bin. After isolation the pimps/traffickers might arrange for the woman to be attacked or lure her into a relationship with someone whose job it is to subdue her and coerce her into prostitution.

COINTELPRO targeted women’s liberation groups and lesbian groups. This appears to be taking political policing too far as it is plainly ridiculous that such groups in any way represent any danger to national security. These groups were formed for the purpose of giving women a safe venue to socialise, compare their experiences and learn from each other, social resources which are commonplace for men.  Some were also responsible for founding the battered wives shelters as up till then women fleeing dangerous husbands had nowhere safe to go.  Politically it makes no sense, but from the point of view of pimps losing their prospective conscripts into prostitution, it makes every sense. Battered wives were able to obtain protection. Their opponents didn’t want them to be able to obtain protection. They didn’t care what happened to the women and their children so long as the women and children remained under male control. As some violent husbands are also paedophiles and paedophiles most often attack children related to them, this would follow suit for the authorities providing cover and enabling paedophile activity. The same people who prostitute women also prostitute children. Women’s Aid might have been seen as getting in the way of a lucrative racket.

But why infiltrate and subvert lesbian groups? For the same reason. Pimps seek to demolish any sanctuary women seek out to avoid them. Lesbian women by their lifestyle live safer lives than heterosexual women, as they can meet their social, emotional, intellectual and sexual needs, while safely avoiding interaction with men. If lesbian groups had not been sabotaged they could in time create a women controlled social arena, safe from male sabotage and control, and heterosexual women might start imitating their model. The pimps knew from experience that the women they coerced into prostitution could not rely on their families, their lover/husband, their community, nor the law, to protect them. And the pimps did not want that situation changed. If women managed to create their own exclusive social groups, vulnerable women could find protection with other women.

But gang stalkers don’t only attack women, although women are their main target. They also attack men.  Gay men are targeted for recruitment as they can be used for many purposes in the gang stalkers games. Obviously used as prostitutes, but also to discredit male targets in various ways.

Gang stalkers are obsessed with sex. Sex is hugely financially exploitable and is an enjoyable power trip for perverts destroying people’s intimate lives .  Targets believe that intimate real life footage is likely sold on a porn market , so creating emotionally charged sexual footage to sell to a perverted market likely pays great financial rewards. And trashing people’s personal lives is useful for traumatising  people so as to make them more malleable .

But against other men a different criminal formula is used. The objective here is to separate the man from his wealth. The formula followed is a hybrid of cult indoctrination and con artist swindle. It is a long game so the first step is to trick the Target into joining the gang stalking cult. This is to enable the con artists to obtain maximum control over their target until he can be successfully fleeced. The indoctrination secures his silence, isolates him from those who might help, confuses, distracts and subdues his mind, destroys any other loyalties, whether to a person such as his child or spouse, or to a value system like lawfulness, morality or religious faith, and having secured maximum control, tricked/swindled by legal means  or intimidation out of his wealth. The same process of isolating the target is used. Gradually that person’s support group will be whittled away. Long-standing friends will move away. In the workplace  workers will leave. Deaths are common in a Target’s circle.